|
REPRODUCCION DE LOS CONEJOS EN FUNCION A LA SERIE DE FIBONACCI, INCLUSO DEL RELOJ Y DE LA MISMA SANTA CENA (MISMA MANZANA)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5177/f517718e69ee8b7eaf8f5f620b4f296526bb22d7" alt="Resultado de imagen para 144 SERIE DE FIBONACCI"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68169/68169cb6fc7650f012a7534c06e5658c160298aa" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68169/68169cb6fc7650f012a7534c06e5658c160298aa" alt=""
Apocalipsis 21
1. Vi un cielo nuevo y una tierra nueva; porque el primer cielo y la primera tierra pasaron, y el mar ya no existía más.
2. Y yo Juan vi la santa ciudad, la nueva Jerusalén, descender del cielo, de Dios, dispuesta como una esposa ataviada para su marido.
3. Y oí una gran voz del cielo que decía: He aquí el tabernáculo de Dios con los hombres, y él morará con ellos; y ellos serán su pueblo, y Dios mismo estará con ellos como su Dios.
4. Enjugará Dios toda lágrima de los ojos de ellos; y ya no habrá muerte, ni habrá más llanto, ni clamor, ni dolor; porque las primeras cosas pasaron.
5. Y el que estaba sentado en el trono dijo: He aquí, yo hago nuevas todas las cosas. Y me dijo: Escribe; porque estas palabras son fieles y verdaderas.
6. Y me dijo: Hecho está. Yo soy el Alfa y la Omega, el principio y el fin. Al que tuviere sed, yo le daré gratuitamente de la fuente del agua de la vida. (911 O SALMO 119)
7. El que venciere heredará todas las cosas, y yo seré su Dios, y él será mi hijo.
8. Pero los cobardes e incrédulos, los abominables y homicidas, los fornicarios y hechiceros, los idólatras y todos los mentirosos tendrán su parte en el lago que arde con fuego y azufre, que es la muerte segunda.
9. Vino entonces a mí uno de los siete ángeles que tenían las siete copas llenas de las siete plagas postreras, y habló conmigo, diciendo: Ven acá, yo te mostraré la desposada, la esposa del Cordero.
10. Y me llevó en el Espíritu a un monte grande y alto, y me mostró la gran ciudad santa de Jerusalén, que descendía del cielo, de Dios,
11. teniendo la gloria de Dios. Y su fulgor era semejante al de una piedra preciosísima, como piedra de jaspe, diáfana como el cristal.
12. Tenía un muro grande y alto con doce puertas; y en las puertas, doce ángeles, y nombres inscritos, que son los de las doce tribus de los hijos de Israel; (EL MISMO RELOJ, O SANTA CENA O LA MANZANA, LA TRASLACION EN EL TIEMPO)
13. al oriente tres puertas; al norte tres puertas; al sur tres puertas; al occidente tres puertas.
14. Y el muro de la ciudad tenía doce cimientos, y sobre ellos los doce nombres de los doce apóstoles del Cordero.
15. El que hablaba conmigo tenía una caña de medir, de oro, para medir la ciudad, sus puertas y su muro.
16. La ciudad se halla establecida en cuadro, y su longitud es igual a su anchura; y él midió la ciudad con la caña, doce mil estadios; la longitud, la altura y la anchura de ella son iguales. (CUBO=ESPACIO/TIEMPO)
HEXAGONO=OCTAHEDRO =ESTRELLA DE 6 PUNTAS= SATURNO =CUBO/HEXAGONO= ESPACIO/TIEMPO =1 DE REYES 6:20 Y APOCALIPSIS 21:16
EL SEXTO DIA ES EL VIERNES Y EL OCTAVO EL DOMINGO. INCREIBLE
17. Y midió su muro, ciento cuarenta y cuatro codos, de medida de hombre, la cual es de ángel. (EL NEXO DE LA MANZANA, EL PENTAGONO, LA NUEVA JERUSALEN, EL CASTILLO SAN ANGELO DEL VATICANO E INCLUSO EL MISMO PENTAGONO DE WASHINGTON D.C. ES OBVIO EL NEXO DEL RELOJ CON LA MANZANA)
18. El material de su muro era de jaspe; pero la ciudad era de oro puro, semejante al vidrio limpio;
19. y los cimientos del muro de la ciudad estaban adornados con toda piedra preciosa. El primer cimiento era jaspe; el segundo, zafiro; el tercero, ágata; el cuarto, esmeralda;
20. el quinto, ónice; el sexto, cornalina; el séptimo, crisólito; el octavo, berilo; el noveno, topacio; el décimo, crisopraso; el undécimo, jacinto; el duodécimo, amatista.
21. Las doce puertas eran doce perlas; cada una de las puertas era una perla. Y la calle de la ciudad era de oro puro, transparente como vidrio.
22. Y no vi en ella templo; porque el Señor Dios Todopoderoso es el templo de ella, y el Cordero.
23. La ciudad no tiene necesidad de sol ni de luna que brillen en ella; porque la gloria de Dios la ilumina, y el Cordero es su lumbrera. (PROVERBIOS 25:11, OSEA LA MISMA MANZANA, OSEA UNA REFERENCIA AL SOL/ORO/HOMBRE Y LUNA/PLATA/MUJER, OSEA EL MISMO SUEÑO DE JOSE DE GENESIS 37)
24. Y las naciones que hubieren sido salvas andarán a la luz de ella; y los reyes de la tierra traerán su gloria y honor a ella.
25. Sus puertas nunca serán cerradas de día, pues allí no habrá noche.
26. Y llevarán la gloria y la honra de las naciones a ella.
27. No entrará en ella ninguna cosa inmunda, o que hace abominación y mentira, sino solamente los que están inscritos en el libro de la vida del Cordero.
|
|
|
|
Primer Anterior 2 a 9 de 9 Siguiente Último |
|
LA PIEDRA FILOSOFAL DE LA ALQUIMIA. GENESIS 3.14=NACIMIENTO DE EINSTEIN (STEIN=PIEDRA=PEDRO) PORQUE EINSTEIN NACIO EN EL 14 DE MARZO? |
|
|
|
FUE ALBERT EINSTEIN UN ALQUIMISTA? SIN PALABRAS |
|
|
|
LA TEORIA DE LA RELATIVIDAD, AL DEPENDER DEL NUMERO PI, ES OBVIO QUE TAMBIEN DEPENDE DE PHI, EN EL MARCO QUE PI=4/RAIZ CUADRADA DE PHI, COMO LO CONFIRMA LA GRAN PIRAMIDE (PI_RAMIDE). OSEA VOLVEMOS AL 3.14 |
|
|
|
¿COMO SE EXPLICA QUE EL NACIMIENTO DE ALBERT EINSTEIN FUE UN 14 DE MARZO E INCLUSO LA MUERTE DE STEPHEN HAWKING?
¿FUERON VIAJEROS EN EL TIEMPO O HAY UN DIOS TODOPODEROSO QUE NO JUEGA A LOS DADOS?
|
|
|
|
LA RELATIVIDAD DE EINSTEIN EN FUNCION A LA GRAN PIRAMIDE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.alienscientist.com/quasicrystals.html http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2...rrow2014a.html
Quote:
Now, to be fully burdened by this profound conundrum of what to believe and what not to believe regarding this and many other Crop Circles, you must also be made aware that Dr. Dan Shechtman was awarded the 2011 Nobel Prize in chemistry for his discovery of the quasicrystal. This Nobel Prize was announced to the world on October 5, 2011, and this announcement occurred 51 days after the Jubilee Plantation Crop Circle was created! Could this simply be a highly unlikely coincidence? If it is not, then how could the creators of this design have known of this important and upcoming award so far in advance of the date of the announcement? Perhaps to the creators of the Jubilee Plantation Crop Circle time does not mean what it presently means to you and I, and perhaps this Crop Circle’s reference to higher dimensional space may be a clue to the nature of that ability. “Any sufficiently advanced technology will appear as majic”. http://cropcirclesresearchfoundation...-quasicrystal/ |
http://damianohara.blogspot.nl/2011/...icrystals.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasicrystal
Quote:
Today ... we have the standard model, which reduces all of reality to a dozen or so particles and four forces. ... It's a hard-won simplicity [...and...] remarkably accurate. But it is also incomplete and, in fact, internally inconsistent... This boson is so central to the state of physics today, so crucial to our final understanding of the structure of matter, yet so elusive, that I have given it a nickname: the God Particle. Why God Particle? Two reasons. One, the publisher wouldn't let us call it the Goddamn Particle, though that might be a more appropriate title, given its villainous nature and the expense it is causing. And two, there is a connection, of sorts, to another book, a much older one...
—Leon M. Lederman and Dick Teresi, The God Particle: If the Universe is the Answer, What is the Question http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson#Nickname |
Quasicrystals https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_VSpBI5EGM http://www.microscopy.ethz.ch/tate.htmThe NOW of 1946 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJeIockoqaM
Quote:
By 1929, the phenomenon of beta decay prompted Bohr to again suggest that the law of conservation of energy be abandoned, but Enrico Fermi's hypothetical neutrino and the subsequent 1932 discovery of the neutron provided another explanation. This prompted Bohr to create a new theory of the compound nucleus in 1936, which explained how neutrons could be captured by the nucleus. In this model, the nucleus could be deformed like a drop of liquid. He worked on this with a new collaborator, the Danish physicist Fritz Kalckar, who died suddenly in 1938. The discovery of nuclear fission by Otto Hahn in December 1938 (and its theoretical explanation by Lise Meitner) generated intense interest among physicists. Bohr brought the news to the United States where he opened the Fifth Washington Conference on Theoretical Physics with Fermi on 26 January 1939. When Bohr told George Placzek that this resolved all the mysteries of transuranic elements, Placzek told him that one remained: the neutron capture energies of uranium did not match those of its decay. Bohr thought about it for a few minutes and then announced to Placzek, Léon Rosenfeld and John Wheeler that "I have understood everything." Based on his liquid drop model of the nucleus, Bohr concluded that it was the uranium-235 isotope and not the more abundant uranium-238 that was primarily responsible for fission. In April 1940, John R. Dunning demonstrated that Bohr was correct. In the meantime, Bohr and Wheeler developed a theoretical treatment which they published in a September 1939 paper on "The Mechanism of Nuclear Fission".[72] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niels_B...ntum_mechanics |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyRW9uFSmh0eFMale Causality http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkQYFwyX0k8 Nobel Prize Chemistry http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZRTzOMHQ4shttp://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2.../articles.html oedipus aegyptiacus4 5 676 > ONE < 77 77
Quote:
MORPHEUS: At last. Welcome, Neo. As you no doubt have guessed, I am Morpheus.
oNe: It's an honor to meet you.
MORPHEUS: No, the honor is mine....Please, come, sit. I imagine that right now you're feeling a bit like Alice...Tumbling down the rabbit hole? Hmm?
Neo: You could say that.
MORPHEUS: I can see it in your eyes. You have the look of a man who accepts what he sees, because he is expecting to wake up. Ironically, this is not far from the truth.... Do you believe in fate, Neo?
oNe: NO.
MORPHEUS: Why?
Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDadfh0ZdBM http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio#Geometry
Quote:
References to Dalí in the context of science are made in terms of his fascination with the paradigm shift that accompanied the birth of quantum mechanics in the twentieth century. Inspired by Werner Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, in 1958 he wrote in his "Anti-Matter Manifesto": "In the Surrealist period, I wanted to create the iconography of the interior world and the world of the marvelous, of my father Freud. Today, the exterior world and that of physics has transcended the one of psychology. My father today is Dr. Heisenberg." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvador_Dal%C3%AD#Science |
__________________ CRISTIS
Last edited by science2art; 20-09-2014 at 01:58 PM. Reason: Nobel Dali Rebel
https://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=234691&page=9 |
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdadd/cdadd021eda2148ff898589ebc239fb8d99c9316" alt="Resultado de imagen para JOHN MARK ARE SON OF CHRIST AND MARY MAGDALENE"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4605a/4605a698e4114174d3a0c0ad842127466361dec2" alt="Imagen relacionada"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1381/e1381a40cee29468290eeee725f4a15b808ebc70" alt=""
LA PIEDRA FILOSOFAL DE LA ALQUIMIA. GENESIS 3.14=NACIMIENTO DE EINSTEIN (STEIN=PIEDRA=PEDRO). ¿PORQUE EINSTEIN NACIO EN EL 14 DE MARZO osea una referencia al PI=3.14? ¿FUE ALBERT EINSTEIN UN ALQUIMISTA? SIN PALABRAS, ESTA TODO CODIFICADO. TODO ES ALQUIMIA. TODO ESTA INTERRELACIONADO. LA ECONOMIA, LA FISICA, LA FILOSOFIA, LA TEOLOGIA, LA SOCIOLOGIA, LA ASTRONOMIA, LA PSICOLOGIA, EGIPTOLOGIA, MATEMATICAS, ETC,ETC. ¿PORQUE NO SE ENSEÑA ESTO EN LAS UNIVERSIDADES Y TAMPOCO EN LAS DENOMINACIONES RELIGIOSAS TRADICIONALES? ¿ES MAGIA O ES ALQUIMIA? ES OBVIO, EL NEXO CON EL PENTAGONO O LA MANZANA EN EL CONTEXTO A PROVERBIOS 25:11 (SABIDURIA DE SALOMON). LA TEORIA DE LA RELATIVIDAD, AL DEPENDER DEL NUMERO PI, ES OBVIO QUE TAMBIEN DEPENDE DE PHI, EN EL MARCO QUE PI=4/RAIZ CUADRADA DE PHI, COMO LO CONFIRMA LA GRAN PIRAMIDE (PI_RAMIDE). OSEA VOLVEMOS AL 3.14. ¿EL VERDADERO VALOR DE PI ES EL TRADICIONAL O EL DE LA GRAN PIRAMIDE QUE DEPENDE DEL NUMERO 4, UNA OBVIA REFERENCIA A LAS 4 FASES DE LA LUNA O CUARTO MANDAMIENTO DE LA BIBLIA?
¿COMO SE EXPLICA QUE EL NACIMIENTO DE ALBERT EINSTEIN FUE UN 14 DE MARZO E INCLUSO LA MUERTE DE STEPHEN HAWKING? ¿FUERON VIAJEROS EN EL TIEMPO O HAY UN DIOS TODOPODEROSO QUE NO JUEGA A LOS DADOS? TODO ESTA CODIFADO.
LA RELATIVIDAD DE EINSTEIN EN FUNCION A LA GRAN PIRAMIDE
900 × 582
Sabemos que Vesica Piscis esta en funcion al a los 153 peces de Juan 21:11.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a315/0a315d5a25d41f2e774eb2b8bb4ffc5f94cc1243" alt="" Aqui tenemos a Pi - la circunferencia del toro y la vesica piscis 256/153 equivalente a la raiz cuadrada de 3 En el hipercubo las coordinadas binarias de Piscis son decimal 3 y binario 11 153 los pescados de Jesus en la biblia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fr0sty data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93d06/93d06e754a597c0b180092c546bb44f724a45a83" alt="View Post View Post"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff0df/ff0df9991ff6a52d9859c42799bbda852e1ee413" alt="" Did you know the great pyramid is perfect, but they say the top of the pyramid is not in the middle of the square base and has an error of a quarter of a inch lol . but that is because the modern scientists has calculate wrong the Pi number. Pi or π is a mathematical constant whose value is the ratio of any circle's circumference to its diameter in Euclidean space; this is the same value as the ratio of a circle's area to the square of its radius. It is approximately equal to 3.14159 in the usual decimal notation (see the table for its representation in some other bases). π is one of the most important mathematical and physical constants: many formulae from mathematics, science, and engineering involve π. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/708a1/708a19423da6f4b3a58ac2fe84c99fa928a6b7fa" alt="" Circumference = π × diameter data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66115/66115db87acd98fefd64cc62a8cd5a3d7e9309b0" alt="" Area of the circle = π × area of the shaded square Calculating Pi number π can be empirically estimated by drawing a large circle, then measuring its diameter and circumference and dividing the circumference by the diameter. Another geometry-based approach, due to Archimedes,[19] is to calculate the perimeter, P n , of a regular polygon with n sides circumscribed around a circle with diameter d. Then data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd474/cd474f36691f934268d2e4f19e2f7e85e3d5f563" alt="" That is, the more sides the polygon has, the closer the approximation approaches π. Archimedes determined the accuracy of this approach by comparing the perimeter of the circumscribed polygon with the perimeter of a regular polygon with the same number of sides inscribed inside the circle. Using a polygon with 96 sides, he computed the fractional range: data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3ade/a3aded6b6c8ed37e23bb6d4c7de7507fdea5a5a8" alt="" I will say only that his ARCHIMEDES axiom (287-212 BC) resulting from the conclusion that seems logical in our OLD thinking and reference, namely that a circle can be compared and even overlapped with circumscribed polygon with infinite number of sides is not accurate! The modern scientist will say to you if you give them the TRUE PI NUMBER "Archimedes established margin that included PI: between 3.1408 (223/71) and 3.1428 (22 / 7), so the your result are not included in this interval, so that is false!" For the moment all the guys out there uses PI=3.1415(....) but the true Pi number is 3,1446(...) go and measure on terrain!!! practical !!! PI=4/radical(PHI, the golden ratio = 1.61803399(...)) = 3.14460550981492(...) !!!data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/286f1/286f103ad221eada1bb5de92f0f858b5e67ec472" alt="" The Golden Ratio!!! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f675/0f675121fa424a071452e1aaa7e0a9208ae6f6f4" alt="" Facts: According to the true pi number the diameter of the Large Hadron Collider is smaller with 8.13 meters! According to the true pi number the GREAT PYRAMID IS P.E.R.F.E.C.T.!!!!!!! According to the true pi number N.A.S.A. is using the true PI number. lol According to the true pi number the humans will be able to build more perfect buildings (and durable ffs!!!) ACCORDING TO THE TRUE PI NUMBER THE MARKO RODIN SINGLE TORUS COIL WILL BE UPGRADED AND MORE EFFICIENT!!! and a little bigger in diameter data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e0f0/8e0f0fe6d1a70d718e210173f98cfb60103c257f" alt="Smile" )
|
Correction: PI=4/sqrt(PHI)=3.144605511029693144(...)...without doubt...MEASURED!...But, pay attention, please, about the"PARADOX OF THE SMALL ANGLES"up to sqrt[sqrt(89)]=3.071478656(...) sexag.deg. I'll explain you, later!See you, please: http://quadrature.ro |
|
|
|
16 jun. 2009 - 20 publicaciones - 10 autores
PI=4/radical(PHI, the golden ratio = 1.61803399(. ... ACCORDING TO THE TRUE PI NUMBER THE MARKO RODIN SINGLE TORUS COIL ...
|
|
|
|
Soul, Body and Spirit http://www.spirasolaris.ca/solexp3.html The ALCHEMICAL Aspect
Quote:
In light of the above there seems little doubt that in general and in the present astronomical context in particular, Spira Solaris qualifies to be described numerically as "the One and the Many," the "One and the All," "the Alpha and the Omega," and also (from The Chaldean Oracles): "Fountain of Fountains, and of All Fountains, The Matrix of all Things." ..... Pythagoras said the sacred Tetractys is: ` the spring having the roots of ever-flowing nature.' .... The four parts of the Decad, this perfect number, are called number, monad, power and cube. And the interweavings and minglings of these in the origin of growth are what naturally completes nascent number; for when a power of a power; and a cube is multiplied on a cube, it is the power of a cube; and when a cube is multiplied on a cube, the cube of a cube; thus all numbers, from which arise the genesis of what arises, are seven: number, monad, power, cube, power of a power, power of a cube, and cube of a cube. ..... We have seen that the whole nature of things, all the essential properties of physis, were believed by the Pythagoreans to be contained in the tetractys of the decad; and it now appears that, just as we should expect, this ' fountain of ever-flowing nature' contains the periodic movement of life, evolving out of unity and reverting to unity again, in the recurrent revolution of a wheel of birth. It embodies the fundamental Dionysiac representation of palingenesia. But there is something more in it than this. Pythagoras inherited the music of Orpheus, as well as the reincarnation doctrine of Dionysus. From the Orphics he inherited also the doctrine of the fall of the soul from its first perfect state of union with the divine, its degradation into the darkness of this life and of the underworld, and its final restoration to peace and unity. Now, on the model of this doctrine of the fall of the soul, the Pythagorean philosophy must hold that all existence proceeds out of the One and returns to it again; and that the One alone is perfect, while the manifold world of visible body is a turbid medium of appearance, in which the one truth is half-revealed and half-concealed, as the divine soul is manifest in the flesh and yet obscured by it and degraded. There is thus, inherent in the representation handed down from Orphism to Pythagoras, not only the primitive wheel of birth, but another aspect of the movement of life, which is best described as a processional movement out of unity into plurality, out of light into darkness. This movement, also, must be revealed in the nature of numbers, and contained in the tetractys. Pythagoras found it in the procession of numerical series, the study of which he originated, thereby rounding the science of number. It is practically certain, also, that in music he discovered the ratios of the octave, the fifth, and the fourth, contained in the harmonic proportion 12: 8: 6. Now a progression like those contained in the tetractys of Plato's worldsoul --the series, 1: 2: 4: 8, 1: 3: 9: 27– is what the Pythagoreans called an harmonia; it is a continuous entity knit together by a principle of unity running through it, namely the logos or ratio (1/2 or 1/3) which links every term to its predecessor by the same bond. Both series, moreover, radiate from the One, which in Pythagorean arithmetic was not itself a number, but the source in which the whole nature of all numbers was gathered up and implicit. When we note, further, that every number is not only a many, but also one number, we can see how Pythagoras would find the whole movement of cosmic evolution contained in the procession of series, in which the One passes out of itself into a manifold, yet without losing all its unity, and a return from the many to the One is secured by that bond of proportion which runs, backwards and forwards, through the whole series and links it into a ' harmony.' It is thus that we must understand the doctrine that ' the whole Heaven is harmony and number.' The processional movement of physis is modelled upon that of soul, which falls from its first state of union with the divine, but yet remains linked to the One life by mysterious bonds, and can return to it again, purified by music. ...... As for the "geometric figure", that we may already have (whether applicable here or not) and although the concept of "organic motion" may strike some modern readers as strange, it is nevertheless an underlying feature in many ancient major works--the Timaeus of Plato especially. Here it may also be observed that by expressing the exponents of this short section of the Phi-series planetary framework in thirds, the sets [3, 6, 9 , [4, 8, 12] and [6, 12, 18] are also apparent--sets that may or may not be considered further with respect to other passages in Plato, etc. ...... It is in the same fashion that the Timaeus also tries to give a physical account of how the soul moves its body; the soul, it is there said, is in movement, and so owing to their mutual implication moves the body also. After compounding the soul-substance out of the elements and dividing it in accordance with the harmonic numbers, in order that it may possess a connate sensibility for 'harmony' and that the whole may move in movements well attuned, the Demiurge bent the straight line into a circle; this single circle he divided into two circles united at two common points; one of these he subdivided into seven circles. All this implies that the movements of the soul are identified with the local movements of the heavens. (Aristotle, On the Soul) ...... Mind is the monad, science or knowledge the dyad (because it goes undeviatingly from one point to another), opinion the number of the plane, sensation the number of the solid; the numbers are by him expressly identified with the Forms themselves or principles, and are formed out of the elements; now things are apprehended either by mind or science or opinion or sensation, and these same numbers are the Forms of things. Some thinkers, accepting both premises, viz. that the soul is both originative of movement and cognitive, have compounded it of both and declared the soul to be a self-moving number. (Aristotle, On the Soul) ...... Thus that in the soul which is called mind (by mind I mean that whereby the soul thinks and judges) is, before it thinks, not actually any real thing. For this reason it cannot reasonably be regarded as blended with the body: if so, it would acquire some quality, e.g. warmth or cold, or even have an organ like the sensitive faculty: as it is, it has none. It was a good idea to call the soul 'the place of forms', though (1) this description holds only of the intellective soul, and (2) even this is the forms only potentially, not actually. (Aristotle, On the Soul) ..... there will be a need for several sciences. The first and most important of them is likewise that which treats of pure numbers--not numbers concreted in bodies, but the whole generation of the series of odd and even, and the effects which it contributes to the nature of things. When all this has been mastered, next in order comes what is called by the very ludicrous name mensuration, but is really a manifest assimilation to one another of numbers which are naturally dissimilar, effected by reference to areas. Now to a man who can comprehend this, it will be plain that this is no mere feat of human skill, but a miracle of God's contrivance. Next, numbers raised to the third power and thus presenting an analogy with three-dimensional things. Here again he assimilates the dissimilar by a second science, which those who hit on the discovery have named stereometry [the gauging of solids], a device of God's contriving which breeds amazement in those who fix their gaze on it and consider how universal nature molds form and type by the constant revolution of potency and its converse about the double in the various progressions. The first example of this ratio of the double in the advancing number series is that of 1 to 2; double of this is the ratio of their second powers [ 4 ], and double of this again the advance to the solid and tangible, as we proceed from 1 to 8 [ 1, 2, 2^2, 2^3]; the advance to a mean of the double, that mean which is equidistant from lesser and greater term [the arithmetical], or the other mean [the harmonic] which exceeds the one term and is itself exceeded by the other by the same fraction of the respective terms--these ratios of 3 : 2 and 4 : 3 will be found as means between 6 and 2: why, in the potency of the mean between these terms [ 6 x 2 ], with its double sense, we have a gift from the blessed choir of the Muses to which mankind owes the boon of the play of consonance and measure, with all they contribute to rhythm and melody. So much, then, for our program as a whole. But to crown it all, we must go on to the generation of things divine, the fairest and most heavenly spectacle God has vouchsafed to the eye of man. And: believe me, no man will ever behold that spectacle without the studies we have described, and so be able to boast that he has won it by an easy route. Moreover, in all our sessions for study we are to relate the single fact to its species; there are questions to be asked and erroneous theses to be refuted. We may truly say that this is ever the prime test, and the best a man can have; as for tests that profess to be such but are not, there is no labor so fruitlessly thrown away as that spent on them. We must also grasp the accuracy of the periodic times and the precision with which they complete the various celestial motions, and this is where a believer in our doctrine that soul is both older and more divine than body will appreciate the beauty and justice of the saying that ' all things are full of gods ' and that we have never been left unheeded by the forgetfulness or carelessness of the higher powers. There is one observation to be made about all such matters. If a man grasps the several questions aright, the benefit accruing to him who thus learns his lesson in the proper way is great indeed; if he cannot, 'twill ever be the better course to call on God. Now the proper way is this--so much explanation is unavoidable. To the man who pursues his studies in the proper way, all geometric constructions, all systems of numbers, all duly constituted melodic progressions, the single ordered scheme of all celestial revolutions, should disclose themselves, and disclose themselves they will, if, as I say, a man pursues his studies aright with his mind's eye fixed on their single end. As such a man reflects, he will receive the revelation of a single bond of natural interconnection between all these problems. If such matters are handled in any other spirit, a man, as I am saying, will need to invoke his luck. We may rest assured that without these qualifications the happy will not make their appearance in any society; this is the method, this the pabulum, these the studies demanded; hard or easy, this is the road we must tread. (The Collected Dialogues of Plato) http://www.spirasolaris.ca/sbb4d.html |
1998 + ONEneo = 1999 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Matrix http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aztec_calendar_stonehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_squarehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpinski_trianglehttp://www.davidicke.com/forum/showt...=61370&page=73 http://www.spirasolaris.ca/sbb4d2c.html http://www.banksy.co.uk/http://edition.cnn.com/2013/10/28/us...ter-editorial/data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe457/fe45730704f40b7238437ceec877219984669612" alt="" http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showp...postcount=1449
__________________ CRISTIS
Last edited by science2art; 02-11-2013 at 05:54 PM. Reason: Thatcheria mirabilis Spiral/911 "betrayal"
https://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?p=1061814088 |
|
|
|
|
|
Primer
Anterior
540 a 554 de 644
Siguiente
Último
|