Siria

ORIGIN OF ORION/GIZA CORRELATION THEORY

The Orion's Belt correlation with the three pyramids of Giza was originally published by Robert Bauval author of The Orion Mystery and it is one that Wayne Herschel author of The Hidden Records has built on and presented here on this website with all the pyramids taken into context. ref

The Hidden Records correlation theory duplicates only Robert Bauval's three pyramids of Giza with due credit, but from here forward a complete 50 pyramid theory is presented backed up by a string of new discoveries, the greatest being the star shafts correlations that duplicate a complete daily shaft alignment scan including all the new stars proposed by Herschel for the 50 pyramids. ref

A point of interest here since Wayne Herschel's book... Robert Bauval's 2006 Egypt Decoded also generally agrees with Herschel's Abusir Pleiades correlation published in 2003.

In the image above as seen in the Hidden Records book... it is a digital masterpiece of many hours work carefully digitally removing every single thing on the Giza Plateau that was built over the last 2000 years. It also has the pyramids seen in a perfect overhead shot used in the top image to measure correlation.


CYGNUS THEORY... ACCIDENTAL ERROR OR HOAX?

Although internet speculation of the Cygnus theory has most believing it is fake, Wayne believes the Cygnus claim is just a collection of accidental errors that many usually make who are not familiar with astronomy.

The results that unfold here not only prove that Robert Bauval's Orion's Belt theory is an out right winner from perspective of appearance, ancient Egyptian history reference, reasoning and logic... but it will show how extremely questionable the Cygnus theory is and why some say that it is such an obscure choice of stars, it begs questioning how and why the theory started in the first place.


SECOND PRIMARY FLAW...

THE STARS OF CYGNUS ARE NOT AS BRIGHT AND SO WIDESPREAD AND WITHIN THE BRIGHT BAND OF THE MILKY WAY THAT IT IS VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO SEE A THREE IN A ROW CORRELATION THEME

Note the importance of comparing apples with apples, both Cygnus and Orion's Belt below are photographed with a visual star size appearance mode similar to how they appear to the naked eye. Note the background brightness difference. Cygnus has the Milky Way behind it and Orions Belt has clear sky. The reason the stars look so small here is due to the fact an equal widespread shot would be too big for the computer screen to fit when setting the same size window as the Orion image. (That is why the binding red lines seem different between the two images but its because the stars are far apart).

Here is an astronomers referenced image that is of similar settings to verify the accuracy of the image ref.

The difference to how Orion's belt with three bright stars in a row theme appeares in the sky compared to Cygnus is astronomical to say the least. Orion's Belt is fairly large in the sky that all recognise filling within 3 degrees of arc in the sky. But Cygnus with a brighter background from the Milky Way and stars of generally lower magnitude as a whole are spread across a vast 16 degrees of arc in the sky! More than five times the sky spread of Orion's Belt! That is why the Cygnus stars appear so small in the image due to a smaller window size needed.

Note the ringed star in the Cygnus image. This is Deneb the brightest star in the Cygnus constellation RIGHT NEXT to the three stars chosen AND IT BY LOGIC NEEDS TO BE PART OF GIZA THEME WITH A BIGGER PYRAMID THAN THE GREAT PYRAMID IF CYGNUS WAS BEING DUPLICATED! This position on the ground is an absolute zero match with anything important.

This is why in average near city sky conditions with the naked eye its really ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE to chose any 3 stars in a row theme with the three Cygnus stars chosen in this questionable correlation claim.