Isaac Newton and the Philosopher's Stone: Papers show how genius who discovered gravity was obsessed with alchemy and spent years trying to produce mythical substance that could turn base metals into gold
Papers reveal some of Newton's thoughts on work of Johann de Monte Snyders
Newton had obsession with alchemy and wanted to find the Philosopher's Stone
A set of papers written by physicist Isaac Newton that point to his decades-long quest to produce the mythical Philosopher's stone are set to fetch more than £120,000 at auction.
The papers, which are written in Latin and have some English headings, are a distillation of the chemical processes contained within the writings of influential 17th-century alchemist Johann de Monte Snyders.
Snyders was renowned for his alleged skill with transmutation - turning lead into gold.
Although Newton, who died in 1727, is best known for his discovery of gravity, the physicist also had a lifelong obsession with alchemy.
The pursuit's practitioners sought to turn base metals into gold or silver and also discover a way of extending life - but their efforts were in vain.
The holy grail was the Philosopher's stone, a substance also known as the elixir of life which alchemists believed was essential to achieving their aims.
It was made more famous by JK Rowling's first novel Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone and the subsequent 2001 film, which saw villain Voldemort try to obtain the object so he could restore himself to physical form.
A set of papers written by physicist Isaac Newton that point to his decades-long quest to produce the mythical Philosopher's stone are set to fetch more than £120,000 at auction
The paper being sold is called 'A Key to Snyders' is tipped to sell for up to $150,000 (£120,320) and will be offered at a Bonhams' sale in the US from April 28 to May 7.
According to William Newman, the leading authority on Newton's alchemy, the works of Snyders 'exercised more impact on Newton the alchemist than any other author short of Philalethes.'
Newton spend decades pouring over two influential texts produced by Snyders.
The manuscript being sold comprises Newton's identification of Snyders' most important passages, as well as his struggle to 'reassemble the dissociated parts of Snyders' process', according to Professor Newman's book Newton the Alchemist.
The papers, which are written in Latin and have some English headings, are a distillation of the chemical processes contained within the writings of influential 17th-century alchemist Johann de Monte Snyders
The paper being sold is called 'A Key to Snyders' is tipped to sell for up to $150,000 (£120,320) and will be offered at a Bonhams' sale in the US from April 28 to May 7
Snyders would communicate his self-proclaimed knowledge in only small bits that left Newton and others confounded.
Newton's main aim was to discern the concrete details of Snyders' chemical producer for formulating the 'Universal Medicine' that would cure disease.
The physicist was occupied by his quest to produce the Philosopher's Stone for more than 30 years.
He had one of the largest alchemical libraries in Europe. The scientist believed it was necessary to assemble the full set of stages for producing the stone from multiple authors.
The Philosopher's Stone was depicted in JK Rowling's first Harry Potter novel and the subequent 2001 film, which saw villain Voldemort try to obtain the object so he could restore himself to physical form
Newton was also convinced that chemistry held the key to understanding gravity.
However, because he was so guarded about his alchemical research, only one text relating to it was published in his lifetime.
'De Natura Acidorum', which was written in 1692, was printed without his approval.
Newton famously told how he was inspired to formulate his theory of gravity after watching an apple fall from a tree.
Philosopher Voltaire, in his Essay on Epic Poetry, later wrote: 'Sir Isaac Newton walking in his gardens, had the first thought of his system of gravitation, upon seeing an apple falling from a tree.'
Beyond his pursuits in science, Newton helped to rescue Britain's economy as master of the Royal Mint.
Currently Unavailable. Contact us if you would like to be placed on a want list or to be notified if a similar item is available.
NOVEMBER 09, 1919
NEW YORK TIMES, November 9, 1919
* Very early Albert Einstein * Theory of Relativity proved
Page 6 begins with an article which, in scientific circles, is definitive proof of Einstein's theory of relativity. As background, in 1916 Albert Einstein published his general theory of relativity in full mathematical detail. That opened the window on a radically new framework for physics, abolishing established notions of space and time and replacing Newton’s formulation of the laws of gravity. Einstein’s revolution was to change the course of science; but in the years immediately after publication, there was no definitive observational evidence that his theory was correct. But an eclipse in 1919 gave opportunity to prove it. By harnessing a total solar eclipse scientists argued that the bending of light by the sun’s gravity could be measured. This was a critical test, because Einstein’s theory predicted a deflection precisely twice the value obtained using Isaac Newton’s law of universal gravitation. The observations proved Einstein's theory correct. The column heads on page 6: "ECLIPSE SHOWED GRAVITY VARIATION" "Diversion of Light Rays Accepted as Affecting Newton's Principles" "Hailed As Epochmaking" "British Scientist Calls the Discovery One of the Greatest of Human Achievements". The photos show the full text of the article. Complete 1st section only with 24 pages, light toning and a little wear at the margins, irregular along the spine, generally good. Should be handled with care.
The gravity of Mars is a natural phenomenon, due to the law of gravity, or gravitation, by which all things with mass around the planet Mars are brought towards it. It is weaker than Earth's gravity due to the planet's smaller mass. The average gravitational acceleration on Mars is 3.72076 m/s2 (about 38% of the gravity of Earth) and it varies.[1]
In general, topography-controlled isostasy drives the short wavelength free-air gravity anomalies.[2] At the same time, convective flow and finite strength of the mantle lead to long-wavelength planetary-scale free-air gravity anomalies over the entire planet.[3][4] Variation in crustal thickness, magmatic and volcanic activities, impact-induced Moho-uplift, seasonal variation of polar ice caps, atmospheric mass variation and variation of porosity of the crust could also correlate to the lateral variations.[5][6][7][8][9]
Over the years models consisting of an increasing but limited number of spherical harmonics have been produced. Maps produced have included free-air gravity anomaly, Bouguer gravity anomaly, and crustal thickness. In some areas of Mars there is a correlation between gravity anomalies and topography. Given the known topography, higher resolution gravity field can be inferred. Tidal deformation of Mars by the Sun or Phobos can be measured by its gravity. This reveals how stiff the interior is, and shows that the core is partially liquid. The study of surface gravity of Mars can therefore yield information about different features and provide beneficial information for future Mars landings.
Rotating spherical harmonic, with ℓ=0 to 4 for the vertical, and �=0 to 4 for the horizontal. For the Martian C20 and C30, they vary with time because of the seasonal variation of mass of the polar ice caps through the annual sublimation-condensation cycle of carbon dioxide.
To understand the gravity of Mars, its gravitational field strengthg and gravitational potential U are often measured. Simply, if Mars is assumed to be a static perfectly spherical body of radius RM, provided that there is only one satellite revolving around Mars in a circular orbit and such gravitation interaction is the only force acting in the system, the equation would be
����2=���2,
where G is the universal constant of gravitation (commonly taken as G = 6.674 × 10−11 m3 kg−1 s−2),[10]M is the mass of Mars (most updated value: 6.41693 × 1023 kg),[11]m is the mass of the satellite, r is the distance between Mars and the satellite, and � is the angular velocity of the satellite, which is also equivalent to 2�� (T is the orbiting period of the satellite).
Therefore, �=����2=�3�2��2=4�3�2�2��2, where RM is the radius of Mars. With proper measurement, r, T, and RM are obtainable parameters from Earth.
where �,�,� are spherical coordinates of the test point.[12]� is longitude and � is latitude. �ℓ� and �ℓ� are dimensionless harmonic coefficients of degree � and order �.[12]�ℓ� is the Legendre polynomial of degree � with �=0 and is the associated Legendre polynomial with �>0. These are used to describe solutions of Laplace's equation.[12]� is the mean radius of the planet.[12] The coefficient �ℓ0 is sometimes written as ��.
The lower the degree ℓ and order �, the longer wavelength of anomaly it represents. In turn, long-wavelength gravity anomaly is influenced by global geophysical structures.
The higher the degree ℓ and order �, the shorter wavelength of anomaly it represents. For degree over 50, it has been shown that those variations have high correlation with the topography.[13] Geophysical interpretation of surface features could further help deriving a more complete picture of the Martian gravity field, though misleading results could be produced.[13]
The oldest technique in determining the gravity of Mars is through Earth-based observation. Later with the arrival of uncrewed spacecraft, subsequent gravity models were developed from radio tracking data.
A simple equation relates wavelength and frequency to the speed of the wave.
The wavelength to frequency and frequency to wavelength calculations are important in physics and engineering. Here is the equation relating wavelength and frequency, example calculations, and a table of common values.
Relationship Between Wavelength and Frequency
A simple equation relates wavelength to frequency:
v = λf
v = wave velocity (how fast the wave propagates in a medium)
λ = wavelength (distance over which a wave shape repeats)
f = wave frequency (number of waves per unit of time)
For light and other electromagnetic radiation in a vacuum, the wave velocity is the speed of light (c):
c = λf
But, the wave speed is different for other kinds of waves and for light passing through a medium.
Light in air or vacuum: 299,792,458 meters per second
Light in water: 224,901,000 m/s
Sound in air: 343.2 m/s
Sound in water (20 °C): 1,481 m/s
Wavelength and frequency are inversely proportional. As wavelength increases, frequency decreases. As frequency increases, wavelength decreases.
How to Calculate Wavelength From Frequency
Rearrange the equation and calculate wavelength from frequency:
λ = v/f
For example, find the wavelength of the musical note A4, which has a frequency of 440 Hz.
The only tricky part in the calculation is keeping the units straight. Usually, you work with meters and Hertz and then convert to other units (e.g., nanometers, THz, GHz). In this problem, the wave velocity is the speed of sound in air (343.2 m/s). The frequency is 440 Hz. One hertz unit equal one cycle (wave) per second, so a frequency of 440 Hz is 440 s-1.
λ = v/f λ = (343.2 m/s)/(440 s-1) λ = 0.78 m or 78 cm
As another example, find the frequency of the green light of the aurora borealis, which has a frequency of 5.38 x 1014 Hz.
Here, the equation is:
λ = c/f λ = (3 x 108 m/sec)/(5.38 x 1014 s-1) λ = 5.576 x 10-7 m = 557.6 nm
How to Calculate Frequency From Wavelength
Rearrange the equation and calculate frequency from wavelength:
f = v/λ
For example, find the wavelength of orange light with a frequency of 4.8×1014 Hz.
f = v/λ (but v is c for light) f = c/λ f = (3.00 × 108 m/s)/(4.8×1014 s-1) f = 6.2 x 10-7 m = 620 nm
Wavelength to Frequency Chart
This chart shows the wavelength to frequency relationship for electromagnetic radiation:
Supposed demonstrations are continually exposed that the theory of Relativity in relation to the curvature of space, is correct. However, and to my understanding, they are only misinterpreted and erroneous deductions, which make me suspect that an attempt is only made to give value to research and observations for the mere fact of being in agreement with Relativity. As can be seen in the drawing, the idea and theory of the curvature of space produced by matter or mass does not have consistency since a simple observer can appreciate that any object attracted by a large mass does not curve in its direction of approach, but rather that goes in a straight line and not towards a pole of that great mass. It can also be analyzed and discussed the fact that any moving body that undergoes a curvature in its path, is slowed down by the change of direction of the inertial force that it carries, and therefore could never be accelerated as actually occurs in the attraction of an object by a large material mass. On the other hand, if gravity was not an accelerating force, and it was only a cause of the curved space, then situated on the surface of the earth we would only be a curved body, but not accelerated towards the center of the earth, that is say, we would not weigh anything, could jump and fly as we pleased, etc. But this does not happen, because we do weigh ourselves (me 65 kg.), And if we make a small jump, the earth counteracts this movement with a contrary force produced by gravity, which is therefore a force. A supposed deformation of space, which only the great scientific minds know how to imagine correctly (but not explain), is only deformation, not thrust force. Therefore, in the observation and measurement of movement, inertia, momentum, etc. from an attracted mass it is extracted as a consequence: 1.- That this attracted mass does so in a direct line towards the attracting mass. 2.- That it is not slowed down by having a curved road. 3.- That the attracted mass is impelled in its movement by fields of force (gravity) that, because it is concentric on the star that attracts it, this force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the mass that it is attracts. As can be seen, there are three simple and clear observations that are always made in any approach movement between stars and attracted objects. Now, as Relativity is considered for now, more as a dogma of faith than as a theory to discuss and verify, since it is preferred to ignore the simple and visible, and to look for new imaginary methods to make true what at first glance seems to be impossible. Perhaps it is because we live in times of virtual and imaginary effects and we want to get away from the sad and boring of simple scientific research and discussion. It is very funny that with our mathematical formulas we can create a parallel and virtual universe, in which there are virtual particles; being able to be in two or more places at the same time; create entanglements of particles; get mass and matter out of nothing; create wormholes that take us throughout the Universe, etc. etc. Really funny!
As we see in the drawing, perhaps a bit exaggerated, the curvature of the space of Einstein and Schwarzschild is so far-fetched and far from visible reality that it is impossible to give it the least credibility, if you are a bit critical and minimally we review the proposal of these scientists. Three simple observations: 1.- If space is deformed by matter, this which is also space will be deformed to the same degree of curvature and shape, and thus, a material nucleus (e.g. the sun) would follow this deformation., (as is seen in the drawing) 2.- If this deformation of space exists, each of the planets would also rotate in different planes of rotation on the sun (depending of the radius to the sun) following this curvature, as seen in the drawing. But we see that this is not the case, and they all have a similar plane of rotation. 3.-All the stars, sun, planets, etc. They have a force of cohesion and compression of their masses in a spherical shape, reaching a great pressure inside them, for which a huge compression force is needed on the mass of the star, an issue that would not occur if the nuclear matter were only deformed into curve (which cannot even be imagined its shape for the simple reason that it is not possible) Therefore I understand that it is a theory for faithful followers, but not for critics who look for the pros and cons of each theory.
The example of Saturn, like that of our planet, the sun, the observation of galaxies, etc. they show us that Einstein's curvature of space and Schwarzschild's metric are wrong theories. However, for those who do not like the "raw" reality, they can scape of it with theoretical assumptions of imaginary black holes, those which everyone sees and knows perfectly (sorry for the sarcasm)
Saturn says no! to Einstein and Karl Schwarzschild
As we see in the drawing, Saturn is a planet that seems to be built on purpose to demonstrate the erroneousness of the theories of curvature of space by large material nuclei. The completely flat orbital shape of its rings and moons tells us clearly that this planet does not curve space. And we see it clearly, if we wish to do so, when verifying that from its more near vicinity to the distant moons, not even the smallest detail of that proposed Einstein curvature is observed. If we go to other planets and observe the rotation and also flat situation of their moons, we observe that there is no curvature either. If we go to the sun, we also observe the same thing. And if we go to the galaxies, the rotation in a flat way of its star disc is also observed, with a more compact formation in its center. So we ask ourselves, where do we have to go to observe the curvature of space? Well, to our relativistic mind to imagine black holes that yes, those fulfill the Schwarzschild metric.
Below is a comparison of my model and that of Einstein (Schwarzschild)
I put drawing on the comparison of my model (TOE.1992) and Einstein's model (Schwarzschild) In this model the deformation (of both gravitational and magnetic fields) is in spiral way due to the rotation of the large nuclei of matter. With this spiral deformation, stationary orbits are created on the spin equator where orbitals (planets, moons, electrons, etc.) are driven and stabilized in them. As we can see, the location of the elements that rotate around the nuclei (stars in the galaxies, planets in the solar systems, moons in the planets, electrons in the atoms, etc.) coincide with the deformation spiral of the magnetic fields and gravitational about the equator of rotation. With this rotation, the north-south N-S polar direction is also created, with which stars, atoms, etc. are aligned. when creating molecules.
n 1854 a slab of marble donated by Pope Pius IX arrived in Washington, D.C. He had it engraved “A Roma Americae,” or “From Rome to America,” as a sign of goodwill. He had sent it over to be included in the Washington Monument, which was then under construction. Many foreign governments had sent similar contributions to honor America’s first president. The Know Nothings, however, had no intention of allowing a gift from the Pope to be included in the Washington Monument. They were certain the stone was a sign of darker intentions by the Pope. So on March 9, 1854, under cover of darkness, a group of these anti-Catholics broke into the yard, stole the stone, and after damaging it with hammers they dropped it in the Potomac River. No one was ever credibly accused of the crime, despite reward offers and a public outcry. Many years later, however, after a tip, the stone was discovered… only to disappear again. But today, there is a stone from the Pope in the Washington Monument, this one was provided by Pope John Paul II in 1982.
47.6208°N 3.0482°W[41] A large dolmen measuring 12 by 5 m (39 by 16 ft), with a 5 m (16 ft) long broken capstone.[6] It is named after the nearby Chapelle de La Madeleine, which is still used.
Dolmen of Kercado. Though smaller than St. Michel, older by many centuries before 4800 BC.
A rare dolmen still covered by its original cairn. South of the Kermario alignments, it is 25 to 30 metres (82–98 ft) wide, 5 m (16 ft) high, and has a small menhir on top. Previously surrounded by a circle of small menhirs 4 m (13 ft) out,[39] the main passage is 6.5 m (21 ft) long and leads to a large chamber where numerous artifacts were found, including axes, arrowheads, some animal and human teeth, some pearls and sherds, and 26 beads of a unique bluish Nephrite gem. It has some Megalithic art carved on its inner surfaces in the form of serpentines and a human-sized double-axe symbol carved in the underside of its main roof slab. In ancient cultures, the axe and more precisely the bi-pennis used to represent the lightning powers of divinity. It was constructed around 4600 BC and used for approximately 3,000 years.[39]
(Pixies' mound or Grotte de Grionnec[39]):A group of three dolmens with layout unique in Brittany,[39] once covered by a tumulus. Whereas most groups of dolmens are parallel, these are arranged in a horseshoe. The largest of the three is at the east, 11 metres (36 ft).[38]
A "classic" dolmen, with a 40-tonne (44-short-ton), 7.6-metre (24 ft 11 in) tablestone resting on pillars roughly 1.8 m (5 ft 11 in) high. Prior to 1900, it was connected by a passage making it 24 m (79 ft) long.[39]
47.625°N 3.122°W: A classic 3, 4, 5 rectangle of 21 menhirs varying in height from 0.91 metres (3.0 ft) to 2.4 metres (7.9 ft) that is aligned along its diagonal to the midsummer sunrise. Alexander Thom suggested it measured forty by thirty of his megalithic yards.[43]
An arrangement of stones to form the perimeter of a large rectangle. Originally a "tertre tumulus" with a central mound, it is 37 m (121 ft) long, and aligned to east of northeast. The quadrilateral is 10 m (33 ft) wide to the east, but only 7 m (23 ft) wide at the west.[44]
47.603°N 3.056°W[45] Near the quadrilateral is a single massive menhir, now known as the "Giant". Over 6.5 m (21 ft) tall, it was re-erected around 1900 by Zacharie Le Rouzic,[39] and overlooks the nearby Kerlescan alignment.[46]
From the 1720s increasing interest was shown in these features.[47] In 1796, for example, La Tour d'Auvergne attributed them to druidic gatherings.[39] In 1805, A. Maudet de Penhoët claimed they represented stars in the sky.[39]
Englishmen Francis Ronalds and Alexander Blair made a detailed survey of the stones in 1834.[48] Ronalds created the first accurate drawings of many of them with his patented perspective tracing instrument, which were printed in a book Sketches at Carnac (Brittany) in 1834.[49]
The first extensive excavation was performed in the 1860s by Scottish antiquary James Miln (1819–1881), who reported that by then fewer than 700 of the 3,000 stones were still standing.[50] Towards 1875, Miln engaged a local boy, Zacharie Le Rouzic [fr] (1864–1939), as his assistant, and Zacharie learnt archaeology on the job. After Miln's death, he left the results of his excavations to the town of Carnac, and the James Miln Museum was established there by his brother Robert to house the artifacts. Zacharie became the director of the Museum and, although self-taught, became an internationally recognised expert on megaliths in the region. He too left the results of his work to the town, and the museum is now named Le Musée de Préhistoire James Miln – Zacharie le Rouzic.[51][52]
The Ménec alignments of some 1,100 stones in 11 columns
In 1887, H. de Cleuziou argued for a connection between the rows of stones and the directions of sunsets at the solstices.[39]
Among more recent studies, Alexander Thom worked with his son Archie from 1970 to 1974 to carry out a detailed survey of the Carnac alignments, and produced a series of papers on the astronomical alignments of the stones as well as statistical analysis supporting his concept of the megalithic yard.[51][53] Thom's megalithic yard has been challenged.[54][55]
There are also general theories on the use of the stones as astronomical observatories, as has been claimed for Stonehenge. According to one such theory, the massive menhir at nearby Locmariaquer was linked to the alignments for such a purpose.[15]
Sheep grazing around the Kerlescan alignment, part of a new management strategy
The Musée de Préhistoire James Miln – Zacharie le Rouzic is at the centre of conserving and displaying the artefacts from the area.[52] It also contains the "world's largest collection [of] prehistoric[al] exhibits"[38] with over 6,600 prehistoric objects from 136 different sites.
The monuments themselves were listed and purchased by the State at the start of the 20th century to protect them against quarrymen, and while this was successful at the time, in the middle of the century, redevelopment, changes to agricultural practices and increasing tourism bringing visitors to the stones led to rapid deterioration. The Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication (Heritage Ministry) re-examined the issue starting in 1984, and subsequently set up the 'Mission Carnac' in 1991 with the aim of rehabilitating and developing the alignments. This involved restricting public access, launching a series of scientific and technical studies, and producing a plan for conservation and development in the area.[56]
As with the megalithic structure of Stonehenge in England, management of the stones can be controversial. Since 1991, the main groups of stone rows have been protected from the public by fences "to help vegetation growth",[38] preventing visits except by organised tours. They are open during winter, however.[57] When James Miln studied the stones in the 1860s, he reported that fewer than 700 of the 3,000 stones were still standing, and subsequent work during the 1930s and 1980s (using bulldozers) rearranged the stones, re-erecting some, to make way for roads or other structures. In 2002, protesters invaded the site, opening the padlocks and allowing tourists free entry.[50] In particular, the group Collectif Holl a gevred (French and Breton for "the everyone-together collective") occupied the visitor centre for the Kermario alignment, demanding an immediate stop to current management plans and local input into further plans.[58]
In recent years, management of the site has also experimented with allowing sheep to graze among the stones, in order to keep gorse and other weeds under control.[59]
In June 2023, 39 menhirs still outside the UNESCO protected site were destroyed to construct a DIY store of the Mr. Bricolage franchise, which obtained a building permit from the local town hall in August 2022. The affected stones are located in the town of Montaubin, separate from the primary tourist locations of Ménec and Kermario, which are situated a little over 1.5km (1 mile) away. The town's mayor, Olivier Lepick, told AFP that he had "followed the law" and pointed to the "low archaeological value" of objects found during checks before the construction process began. He also admitted to being unaware that the site was listed on the Heritage Atlas, despite reportedly presiding over the group that applied for UNESCO status for the prehistoric sites. While Lepick blamed the region's complex zoning situation, the researcher Christian Obeltz claimed that "elected officials in the area and the department are in a hurry to build up anything because once it is classified with UNESCO, it won't be possible anymore". The local Koun Breizh association has decided to lodge a complaint with the public prosecutor of Vannes for willful destruction of sites that relate to archaeological heritage.[60][61][62][63]