Rispondi |
Messaggio 1 di 19 di questo argomento |
|




Pope Francis delivered a speech too progressive for Obama to give
Sep 24, 2015, 4:20 PM GMT-3
Pope Francis waves to the crowd from the Speakers Balcony at the US Capitol, September 24, 2015, in Washington, DC. Pool/Getty Images
If President Barack Obama had delivered the text of Pope Francis’s speech to Congress Thursday as a State of the Union address, he would have risked being denounced by Republicans as a socialist.
While most Republicans chose not to complain, and Democrats tried not to gloat, Francis’s speech to Congress was stunning in the breadth, depth, and conviction of its progressivism. That might not have been fully and immediately appreciated by everyone in the House chamber because the combination of Francis’s sotto voce delivery and his heavily accented English made it difficult, lawmakers said, to grasp everything he was saying.
But there was no mistaking his thrust. He made detailed arguments for openness to immigrants, addressing the human roots of climate change, closing the gap between the rich and the poor, and ending the death penalty — all of which invigorated the Democrats in the room.
“It was pretty progressive. He had a little right-to-life stuff in it,” Rep. James Clyburn, the third-ranking House Democrat, said as he cracked a smile thinking about how Republicans would receive the speech. “That’s enough for them.”
The pope isn’t going to change many hearts and minds in the badly divided Congress, lawmakers said, but the moment provided a brief respite from political warfare. Several presidential candidates, including Sens. Bernie Sanders, Lindsey Graham, Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz, as well as Ben Carson, attended.
Rubio, a Roman Catholic, said in a brief interview that Francis “struck the right tone.” Sanders, a self-described socialist, seemed to like the content even more.
“Pope Francis is clearly one of the important religious and moral leaders not only in the world today but in modern history,” he said in a statement released after the speech. “He forces us to address some of the major issues facing humanity: war, income and wealth inequality, poverty, unemployment, greed, the death penalty and other issues that too many prefer to ignore.”
Democrats were eager enough to present Congress as united that they joined a Republican-led standing ovation when Francis told lawmakers of “our responsibility to protect and defend human life at every state of its development.” Several of them said it was out of respect for the pope. But there was another good reason: It strengthened the perception that the whole speech — most of which they liked — carried unifying themes.
Unity was good for Democrats because the speech favored their policies
Francis was interrupted a few times by whoops from the Democratic side of the chamber — by Steve Cohen, a Jewish Memphis Democrat who got excited about Francis’s mention of the Golden Rule; by New York’s Nydia Velázquez when he called for an end to the death penalty; and by Philadelphia Rep. Chaka Fattah when he mentioned his upcoming visit to that city. The Republicans in the room were a bit more staid. Cruz often appeared unmoved during moments when Rubio, who was sitting nearby, applauded. That was the case when Francis asked whether the greater opportunities sought by past generations of immigrants are “not what we want for our own children?”
It was a home crowd. Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) had announced he would boycott the event over climate change, and there was a brief murmur when it became obvious that three conservative Catholic Supreme Court justices — Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito, and Clarence Thomas — had not shown up. But it seemed that everyone in attendance just wanted to catch a glimpse of Francis and hear what he had to say.
Big-name guests filed into the public galleries above the House chamber long before the pope’s arrival: Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Rep. Gabby Giffords, mega-donor Tom Steyer, and Carson. House members filled the seats in their chamber, followed by the Senate and four Supreme Court justices. At about a minute past 10 am, Francis strode down the center aisle of the House chamber, clad in his familiar white robe and skullcap.
Lawmakers, who had been admonished not to touch the pope, refrained from trying to shake his hand or pat his back. There was no rush to crowd him the way members of Congress try to get into pictures with the president during the annual State of the Union address. When he got to the end of the aisle, he quietly shook hands with Secretary of State John Kerry and then made his way to the rostrum.
Samantha Power, the US ambassador to the UN, pulled out a baby blue iPhone and began snapping pictures. Though she later took to Twitter to commemorate the moment, Power hadn’t posted any of her photos by midday.
For his part, Francis warmed up the audience by describing America as “the land of the free and the home of the brave.” He was slow to move into more politically charged territory but unimpeded when he did. There were 10 standing ovations after his initial greeting, and they were bipartisan.
Francis tackled tough issues at the heart of the US political debate and gently admonished lawmakers to build bridges
At times, Francis seemed to be speaking directly into the headlines and newscasts of the day.
Less than a week after Carson said that America shouldn’t elect a Muslim president, Francis warned that “a delicate balance is required to combat violence perpetrated in the name of a religion, an ideology or an economic system, while also safeguarding religious freedom, intellectual freedom and individual freedoms.”
As Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump promises to build a wall between Mexico and the US, and to prevent Syrian refugees from being admitted to America, Francis compared the current refugee crisis to the one that arose in World War II and said that “we the people of this continent are not fearful of foreigners, because most of us were once foreigners.” That drew a standing ovation. Rubio, who has shifted his emphasis on immigration reform over time, leaped to his feet.
And while Democrats continue to bask in this summer’s Supreme Court decision protecting same-sex marriage, the pope said he was concerned that “fundamental relationships are being called into question, as is the very basis of marriage and the family.” The issue that caused the biggest stir before the speech — climate change — factored prominently in Francis’s remarks. He spoke of the human roots of global warming and said, “I am convinced we can make a difference.”
But perhaps the most unexpected run in the speech was an admonishment as gentle as it was clear: Politics is about building bridges, not destroying them. Francis never mentioned the international nuclear nonproliferation deal with Iran by name or the gridlock in American politics, but he seemed to be speak to both matters.
“When countries which have been at odds resume the path of dialogue — a dialogue which may have been interrupted for the most legitimate of reasons — new opportunities open up for all,” he said. “A good political leader is one who, with the interests of all in mind, seizes the moment in a spirit of openness and pragmatism. A good political leader always opts to initiate processes rather than possessing spaces.”
Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Joe Pitts, speaking about the pope’s limited remarks on abortion and same-sex marriage, said he was displeased that Francis had been “unfortunately politically correct.”
For liberals, though, he was simply correct about politics.
https://www.vox.com/2015/9/24/9393731/pope-francis-speech-progressive-obama
 |
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 5 di 19 di questo argomento |
|

Centuries ago DC’s Pennsylvania Avenue was supposed to be the city’s answer to a location drawing in residents and tourists alike, much like the Champs Elysees in Paris. Now all these years later, the question many area are asking is if the famous avenue can transform itself from an unremarkable and deteriorating location to America’s version of the luxurious Parisian street, renowned for its high-end stores, cafes and theaters.
For decades proponents of making over the DC street have sought out ways to help revitalize the area, making it more colorful and lively. One of the ideas has to do with what to bring in to replace the old J Edgar Hoover Building. The massive, long-standing building that currently houses FBI headquarters is set to be demolished when the bureau moves out to the suburbs. Right now the leading contention is that a mixed-use, high-density development would be the best thing to take its place.
A major development already in the works for the area is the new Trump International Hotel, going in at the site of the Old Post Office Building. Set to open in September 2016, it’s hoped the hotel will bring in more people for shopping and dining to the area.
In addition, two existing mixed-use buildings near the Navy Memorial fountain are set for a second round of renovations. Other possible ideas include loosening the restrictions on commercial activity on nearby sidewalks, allow for things like public art exhibits and cafes plus possibly bringing new life to Freedom Plaza with outdoor events and concerts.
While none of these things are guaranteed to transform Pennsylvania Avenue into Champs Elysees, supporters hope they can make “America’s Main Street” a more beautiful place for visitors and residents, converting the area from merely a symbolic parade route and connection point for the Capitol and White House to a more beautiful destination in the future.
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 6 di 19 di questo argomento |
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 7 di 19 di questo argomento |
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 8 di 19 di questo argomento |
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 9 di 19 di questo argomento |
|
09/23/2020in DCby Katherine Brodt
There are fifty-one streets in D.C. named for every state and Puerto Rico. But, admittedly, not all state avenues are created equal. Some are long, vital roadways through our city. Others are historic and prominent—the location of our country’s most important events. And some are…well, a bit hard to find. Admit it: you probably couldn’t point to all of them on a city map. So why are some state avenues more prominent than others? Is there any method to the naming madness?
Pierre L'Enfant and Andrew Ellicott's original plans for Washington, D.C., showing the diagonal state avenues cutting across the grid. (Source: Library of Congress)
In his designs for the new capital city, Pierre L’Enfant planned a logical, well-organized grid system of streets. As we know, most of these streets follow numerical and alphabetical patterns—so, ideally, it’s hard to get lost when walking the D.C. blocks. But L’Enfant also planned a series of diagonal avenues—modeled after the Champs Élysées in Paris—that cut through the grid, all meeting and intersecting at the Capitol building. These avenues were meant to ease traffic, encourage growth to the city’s outer regions, and connect the District with outlying towns in Maryland and Virginia. Instead of numbers and letters, they would carry the names of the thirteen states.
Historians aren’t really sure how city planners chose to name these important new roads, but some certainly got better placement than others. Pennsylvania, for example, lent its name to one of the most important new avenues: the one connecting the Capitol to the Presidential Mansion, offering clear views of both seats of power. Certainly, Pennsylvania was an important colony—especially during the Revolution, when it hosted the Continental Congresses. It was also home to the country’s first national capital: Philadelphia. One theory suggests that the Avenue’s name actually honors the location of the former capital city. It might also appease Pennsylvanians after the capital’s removal to Washington—now the city’s most important processional street would carry their name.
However, it’s far more likely that the name is more coincidental. The local historian Frederick Fishback, writing in 1917, explains that “the name of Pennsylvania, because it was the central one of the original thirteen states, was most appropriately given to this thoroughfare in the center of the city.” In this case, “central” doesn’t mean “most important”—it refers to Pennsylvania’s location in the center of the colonial map. As it turns out, L’Enfant planned to organize the state avenues just as logically as the other streets. The mid-Atlantic states—Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland—could find their respective avenues in the center of the city. To their north ran the avenues named for the New England states, like Massachusetts and Connecticut. To their south were—you guessed it—the avenues named for the southern states, like Virginia and Georgia.
But this logical system didn’t last. As the city and country expanded, new streets in Washington carried the names of the new states—though in no particular pattern. States were being added so sporadically that city planners couldn’t really stick to the geographically-organized plan. And within the city boundaries, there really wasn’t enough room for every state to have its broad, diagonal avenue. In 1890, the road that established the District’s northernmost border—the aptly named Boundary Road—got a name change to reflect the growing city’s needs. Although north of city center, this confusing, meandering road is now known as Florida Avenue.
Senator Augustus Octavius Bacon of Georgia, who really wanted something better for his state's avenue. (Source: Library of Congress via Wikimedia Commons)
Of course, some states—perhaps jealous of Pennsylvania’s prime avenue—became offended by the small size or perceived unimportance of their respective avenues. In 1908, “the logical system of avenue nomenclature was unfortunately changed” when Augustus Octavius Bacon, a senator from Georgia, lobbied to change the location of his state’s avenue to a more well-known, trafficked route to towns in Maryland. His proposal turned out to be unpopular—residents of the District were “unanimously opposed” to any name change, especially since “the name Georgia Avenue had been given to that thoroughfare more than a hundred years ago by the founders of this city.” Bacon eventually won his suit, however, and the former Brightwood Avenue in Northwest became Georgia Avenue. The former Georgia Avenue is now Potomac Avenue.
All in all, though, there doesn’t seem to be a precise naming process for Washington’s state avenues. Though organized at first, the avenues are now spread all over the city, regardless of their position on the national map. And don’t worry: the size of your home state’s avenue doesn’t really have anything to do with that state’s importance to the country, either. Some states just got lucky—or cared way too much.
https://boundarystones.weta.org/2020/09/23/whats-name-state-avenues |
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 10 di 19 di questo argomento |
|
uesday 6 A.M.' - the time of the Vice President's resignation. I can't help but sense a coded time reference here. While not so simple, I found a fairly coherent way of decoding this.
Using the earlier decoding method that turned '7:45' into July + 45 days (= Aug. 14), we would get 'June 1' ('6:00') here, which is not very meaningful. But this time we were given two additional clues in the scene - 'Tuesday' and 'A.M.' (previously it was 'P.M.').

First, 'Tuesday' is traditionally 'Mars Day', which gives us a number possible dates. One is Aug. 27, the climax of the historic Earth-Mars close encounter. And adding '6' (i.e. '6:00') months to that yields Feb. 27 or so. (Not very meaningful.)
Another 'Mars Day' is the equinox. This is so because, for instance, the Great Sphinx at Giza, considered a form of Horus by the ancient Egyptians thus also a form of Mars ('Horus the Red'), faces due east so that it aligns with the sunrise (another manifestation of Horus) of the equinox when the sun rises due east. The spring equinox of 2003 was on March 20 which precisely coincided with the start of the Iraq war (Iraqi time).
That the equinox would make a better 'Mars Day' here is revealed when we add '6' months (i.e. '6:00') to the spring equinox because this takes us forward to the very next equinox, the autumn equinox on Sept. 23! And this is right in the 'Mars window' (around September when Mars is brilliant in the night sky).
This interpretation is further corroborated by the episode's opening scene ('preview' of the final scene) indicating the time as 'Tuesday 5:58 A.M.' (instead of '6:00 A.M.').

Taking the change from 'P.M' (as was the case with '7:45') to 'A.M.' as signifying the notion of 'inversion', we are encouraged to read the time code in reverse, i.e. 85:5 instead of 5:58. Following the method used for 7:45, we would have 8 and 55, or August and 55 days. Because August has 31 days, the pinpointed date would be September 24. This is only a day away from the autumn equinox (Sept. 23)! And of course, Sept. 24 in US time is Sept. 23 in many other parts of the world.
Now, did anything significant happen on September 23, '03? Yes - on this very day George W. Bush went to the UN's annual General Assembly, which happened to be the '58th Session' - '58' as in '5:58'.
At the UN, Bush asked for international help on Iraq, and so doing he made official the administration's decision to move away from the neo-con/Pax Americana war strategy. (The neo-cons hate the UN.) This was an important event because it signaled the beginning of the end for the neo-conservatives and their Pax Americana dream. Just as foreshadowed by the disaster of the space shuttle Columbia (= 'American peace') earlier in the year, the Pax Americana plan is falling apart. And certainly this can easily lead to some head rolling - especially the chief architects of the war, like Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz.
Are Cheney and Co. about to get 'fired'? Within a month, or perhaps around the time of the next 'Mars Day', the spring equinox of 2004? It will be interesting to watch...
https://www.goroadachi.com/etemenanki/westwing.htm |
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 11 di 19 di questo argomento |
|
Usando el método de decodificación anterior, que convertía las 7:45 en julio + 45 días (= 14 de agosto), obtendríamos el 1 de junio (6:00), lo cual no es muy significativo. Pero esta vez, la escena nos dio dos pistas adicionales: martes y a. m. (antes era p. m.).

Primero, el martes es tradicionalmente el Día de Marte, lo que nos da varias fechas posibles. Una es el 27 de agosto, el clímax del histórico encuentro cercano entre la Tierra y Marte. Y si le sumamos seis meses (es decir, las 6:00), obtenemos aproximadamente el 27 de febrero. (No muy significativo).
Otro "Día de Marte" es el equinoccio. Esto se debe, por ejemplo, a que la Gran Esfinge de Giza, considerada una forma de Horus por los antiguos egipcios y, por lo tanto, también una forma de Marte ("Horus el Rojo"), está orientada hacia el este, de modo que se alinea con la salida del sol (otra manifestación de Horus) del equinoccio, cuando el sol sale por el este. El equinoccio de primavera de 2003 fue el 20 de marzo, coincidiendo precisamente con el inicio de la guerra de Irak (hora iraquí).
Que el equinoccio sería un mejor «Día de Marte» se revela al añadir seis meses (es decir, las 6:00) al equinoccio de primavera, ya que esto nos adelanta al siguiente equinoccio: ¡el equinoccio de otoño , el 23 de septiembre! Y esto ocurre justo en la «ventana de Marte» (alrededor de septiembre, cuando Marte brilla en el cielo nocturno).
Esta interpretación se ve corroborada además por la escena de apertura del episodio ('vista previa' de la escena final) que indica la hora como 'martes 5:58 AM' (en lugar de '6:00 AM').

Considerando que el cambio de «PM» (como en el caso de «7:45») a «AM» implica la noción de «inversión», se recomienda leer el código de tiempo al revés, es decir, 85:5 en lugar de 5:58. Siguiendo el método utilizado para las 7:45, tendríamos 8 y 55, o agosto y 55 días. Dado que agosto tiene 31 días, la fecha exacta sería el 24 de septiembre. ¡Solo falta un día para el equinoccio de otoño (23 de septiembre)! Y, por supuesto, el 24 de septiembre en la hora de EE. UU. es el 23 de septiembre en muchas otras partes del mundo.
Ahora bien, ¿ocurrió algo significativo el 23 de septiembre de 2003? Sí, ese mismo día, George W. Bush asistió a la Asamblea General anual de la ONU, que coincidió con el 58.º período de sesiones (58, como en 5:58).
En la ONU, Bush solicitó ayuda internacional para Irak, y al hacerlo, oficializó la decisión de la administración de alejarse de la estrategia bélica neoconservadora/Pax Americana. (Los neoconservadores odian a la ONU). Este fue un evento importante porque marcó el principio del fin para los neoconservadores y su sueño de Pax Americana. Tal como lo presagió el desastre del transbordador espacial Columbia (= "paz estadounidense") a principios de año, el plan de Pax Americana se está desmoronando. Y, sin duda, esto puede fácilmente llevar a que algunos caigan en desgracia, especialmente los principales artífices de la guerra, como Cheney, Rumsfeld y Wolfowitz.
¿Están a punto de despedir a Cheney y compañía? ¿Dentro de un mes, o quizás cerca del próximo Día de Marte, el equinoccio de primavera de 2004? Será interesante observar...
https://www.goroadachi.com/etemenanki/westwing.htm |
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 12 di 19 di questo argomento |
|
It is said that Paris esoterically derives its name from 'Par Isis' ('near Isis'). There is a lot of evidence to support this. As Robert Bauval writes in Secret Chamber (p.341):
Napoleon had acquired two nicknames, one being 'L'Aigle' (the Eagle) and the other being 'L'Etoile' (the Star). That 'his star' was Sirius, the star of Isis, is not only made obvious by the coat-of-arms which he chose for Paris but, in a more arcane manner, it seems to have been linked to Napoleon's most famous monument, the Arc de Triomphe, also known as the the Place de L'Etoile (the Place of the Star), located on the western side of the so-called Historical Axis of Paris, better known as the Champs-Elysees, [which is oriented twenty-six degrees north of west]... The star Sirius, as seen from the latitude of Paris, rises twenty-six degrees south of east.
And sure enough the 'Axis of Paris' (the Champs Elysees) was designed to align with the sunset on ~August 6.
This first of all confirms that the date is to be seen as a special day of Sirius' rising, and makes it clear that August 6 is a 'magical date' that is considered very important by past and modern 'esotericists' whose knowledge stems from ancient Egypt. Judging from the 'rise of Schwarzenegger' masterfully brought about on this date in 2003, we can infer that there is something big underway at this time. The encoded symbolism of the Osirian resurrection - or the birth of Horus - should therefore be treated seriously. Indeed, we just may be talking about something akin to the 'rise of Antichrist' here, if that gets your attention... Think Napoleon; think Hitler.
Napoleon is often thought to have been an 'antichristic' figure especially in the context of Nostradamus' prophecies. We often hear that he was 'Antichrist 1', Hitler was 'Antichrist 2', and the third has yet to come... Well, Terminator 3 was in theaters last year just before Schwarzenegger's rise in politics. So we wonder: Was 'Terminator 3' an allusion to 'Antichrist 3'? The answer we find here is amusing and ominous.
The following passage is from the Book of Revelation, apparently talking about an antichristic figure:
And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.
The two names given here, 'Abaddon' and 'Apollyon', both mean the same thing - 'Destroyer'... or even 'Terminator'! And Arnold is not only the Hollywood 'Terminator', he's also been Conan the Destroyer (1984)! The name 'Napoleon' has also been interpreted to mean none other than 'destroyer'... The parallel goes even further as we find that just as Napoleon had the nickname 'the Eagle', the name 'Arnold' means 'eagle rules'.
So, yes - the title 'Terminator 3' does scream 'Antichrist 3'... at least on a symbolic level.
What's more ominous, the chapter/verse number of the Revelation passage above from the New Testament happens to be... 9:11. We are about to see just how fitting this 'coincidental' reference is.
https://www.goroadachi.com/etemenanki/lucifer-timecode.htm
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 13 di 19 di questo argomento |
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 14 di 19 di questo argomento |
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 15 di 19 di questo argomento |
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 16 di 19 di questo argomento |
|
|

Pennsylvania Avenue is roughly aligned with the angle of the Sirius rising as well. So from the direction of the White House Sirius would appear rising behind the Capitol. But the angle is off by about 2 degrees. Not a lot, but not insignificant either. This leads to the next revelation…
Sirius rises 21.2 degrees south of east in DC with atmospheric refraction taken into account (which makes stars visible when slightly below the horizon). This precisely matches the angle of the line going from the “front porch” of the White House (which is the north side facing away from the National Mall) to the center of the “front porch” of the Capitol on the west side (which is actually the back side). A remarkable alignment and one that I don’t think anyone in the general public has noticed before.
Without atmospheric refraction, the rising angle of Sirius in DC would be 21.7 degrees south of east. This one precisely matches the angle of the line connecting the starting point and the destination of the inaugural parade!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 17 di 19 di questo argomento |
|
Aerial view of the U.S. Capitol in the foreground toward National Mall and Pennsylvania Ave. in the distance, Washington, D.C.
https://www.loc.gov/item/2011634186/ |
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 18 di 19 di questo argomento |
|
WASHINGTON D. C. ASTRONOMY
Washington D.C. and many of it's buildings and monuments are laid out according to the cardinal directions with the streets running due NS and EW. In the map of Washington D.C. below, due east is up and the star chart shows the constellation of Orion rising due east over Washington D.C., as it has done every day for the past two hundred years. Orion's belt points towards Sirius, the brightest star in the sky, and while Orion is rising and low on the eastern horizon, Orion's belt is vertical, pointing to Sirius below. In the diagram, Sirius is the bright star below Orion near the upper edge of the map of Washington D.C. The bright star above Orion is Aldebran, the alpha star in the constellation of Taurus.

The axis of the ancient Egyptian temple of Isis at Dendera was oriented to the rising point of Sirius on the eastern horizon. The angle of Pennsylvania Avenue from the White House to the Capitol building has pointed to the rising point of Sirius at the latitude of Washington D.C. since the avenue was laid out over 200 years ago. Looking southeast down Pennsylvania Avenue, Sirius rises directly over the Capitol building. Higher in the sky, Orion is also above Sirius and above the Capitol building from the viewpoint of Pennsylvania Avenue as Sirius rises over the horizon.

The diagram above also shows the sun below the horizon on the left side of the diagram. In relation to the fixed stars, the sun rises later each day due to the rotation of the earth around the sun. The sun rises just after Sirius at the latitude of Washington D.C. on August 15. This is known as the heliacal rising of Sirius. Prior to this time of year, the sun is above or too close to the horizon for the rising of the star to be visible. Ancient Egyptians based their calendar on the heliacal rising of Sirius, which signaled the onset of the annual flooding of the Nile. Christians celebrate the Assumption of the Virgin Mary on August 15, linking the Assumption to the first appearance of Sirius/Isis in the sky just before dawn.
The star spangled headdress on the statue on top of the Capitol dome suggests a stellar symbolism consistent with the alignment of Pennsylvania Avenue targeting the rising point of Sirius above the Capitol building. The picture below is a close up of the statue while it was down for restorations in 1993.

www.teafoe.com
Orion has also set due west at the latitude of Washington D.C. for the past two hundred years. From the viewpoint of the Capitol building, Orion sets right behind the Washington Monument. Setting in the west, Orion's belt is horizontal, pointing to Sirius setting south of due west. From the viewpoint of the Capitol building, Sirius sets over the Potomac River, on the alignment of Maryland Avenue. From the viewpoint of the Capitol building, Aldebran sets over the White House, on the alignment of Pennsylvania Avenue.

BACK
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 19 di 19 di questo argomento |
|
Maryland Avenue |
SW, NE |
Along with Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey Avenues, Maryland Avenue is one of four avenues centered on the U.S. Capitol. It exists in several intermittent sections, including one running from 12th Street SW one block in a cul-de-sac in a development built over railroad tracks, from 7th to 1st Streets SW, in front of the Capitol, and as a major street running from 1st Street NE through Capitol Hill and the Starburst Intersection to Carver Langston. The portion from Constitution Avenue NE to Bladensburg Road NE once carried U.S. 1. There are plans to make the section along the railroad tracks continuous within the Federal Center Southwest neighborhood. Until 1992, an entrance to the National Arboretum existed at the easternmost terminus of Maryland Avenue.[26] |
2.8 miles (4.5 km) |
|
|
|
Primo
Precedente
5 a 19 de 19
Successivo
Ultimo
|