French Revolutionary Time was a short-lived concept that used a base-10 timekeeping system. Otherwise known as “decimal time,” this unprecedented method included 10-hour days, 100 minutes per hour, and 100 seconds per minute. Each day was divided into 10 equal parts, with “zero” marking the start (what is now midnight) and “five” denoting the midpoint (noon). This meant that every hour was more than twice as long as an hour of standard time. New clocks and watches were even manufactured displaying both decimal time and standard time, to considerable confusion.
While France formally adopted this practice on November 24, 1793, the idea was first promoted in 1754. That year, mathematician Jean le Rond d’Alembert drew inspiration from the base-10 numeral system that had existed since ancient times and argued that it would be easier and more convenient to calculate times that were divisible by 10. The concept was revived in 1788 and met with enthusiasm from French revolutionaries seeking to shed their ties to the past. French Revolutionary Time was later adopted by the French Parliament, though it proved to be unpopular among citizens who found the switch confusing. The new system was deemed optional on April 7, 1795, and the country ultimately reverted to the previous timekeeping method.
In addition to changing how the country kept time, revolutionary France also adopted the French Republican calendar. The new formula divided the year into 12 months, each of which contained three 10-day weeks. To bring the total days up to 365, France tacked on five additional days at the end of the year as holidays. Debuted on October 24, 1793, the new calendar was also short-lived, and was abolished by Napoleon Bonaparte on January 1, 1806.
In 1752, the month of September was only 19 days long throughout the British Empire (including its colonies in America), due to the Calendar (New Style) Act of 1750. That parliamentary move transferred the British from the Julian calendar to the Gregorian calendar, the former having overestimated each year's length by about 11 minutes. Back in 1582, Pope Gregory XIII had declared that all countries under the dominion of the Catholic Church needed to adopt the Gregorian calendar, but many Protestant nations — including England — resisted those demands. When Britain finally converted to the Gregorian calendar in 1752 in an effort to catch up with other nations, the country jumped straight from September 2 to September 14, skipping the 11 days in between to account for the errors of the old calendar.
A centimetre is 2.54 inches. At Giza, the number 254 is found as a factor which links various linear dimensions. What does it mean to multiply or divide a linear measure by 254? What does it mean to convert inches to metres, or vice versa?
254 is not the only factor that links the key dimensions at Giza, but it is a common theme. The other factors seem to be based in geometry (such as π , √3), and astronomy (such as 223, 235 and 29.53059).
As 29.53059 x 4/3 inches are close to 10 000 / 254 inches, as are 365.242199 / 354.36708 x 100 / 2.61803 inches, they can be used almost interchangeably to interpret the dimensions at Giza.
10000 / 254 = 39.3700787402
29.53059 x 4/3 = 39.37412
365.242199 / 354.36708 x 100 / 2.61803 = 39.368871
The number 254 is linked to both astronomy and geometry. It is linked to pi, to Phi squared, and to the solar and lunar years, as well as being the number of sidereal months in a Metonic period.
When linear dimensions at Giza are multiplied or divided by 254, it's not necessarily that in one place inches were used and in another metres were used. The metre and the inch can both be said to co-exist at Giza, and even if the metre hadn't appeared in the 18th century it would still appear at Giza. But the use of 254 could in fact be a reference to the ratio between the solar and lunar years combined with Phi squared, or to pi divided by the mean number of lunations in a year.
If we think of possible links between the metre, the inch and the Egyptian royal cubit, the number 254 also makes an appearance, since 2.54 cm are an inch. Converting between inches and metres allows us to see ways of thinking about the Egyptian royal cubit, in relation to geometry and astronomy.
The links between these three units, inch, metre and cubit, and to astronomy and geometry, may hint at something of the symbolic and religious significance of the cubit in ancient Egyptian cosmology and astronomy. It could also explain some of the enduring appeal of the metre and the inch.
Another interesting connection to be made to the number 254 is that, as Howard Crowhurst points out in his book Carnac the Alignments, there are 127 kerb stones around the base of Knowth, in Ireland.
127 is a major prime number (...) and as such is a mirror of the fundamental prime number, One. But it is also half of 254 which is the number of lunar orbits in the 19 year Metonic cycle which also counts 235 full moons. The exact relationship between the metre length and the foot is also to be found through this number since 1 inch = 2.54 cm. Also a right angled triangle with a hypotenuse of 254 m and a base of 235 m has a third side measuring 100.0037 x √10 feet. (1)
The presence of the number 127 in Ireland seems to suggest a link to the repeated presence of 254 at Giza. The 127 stones at Knowth also suggest we should take the inch - metre connection seriously when analysing ancient sites.
Nikola Tesla was a unicorn person before “unicorn person” became a term.
He was a Serbian inventor who came up with the idea of wireless energy transfer among things like alternating current, induction motors and many others.
I would say that he built out his idea of global wireless energy transfer in three phases. The very first was the Tesla Coil, which I made a video about. You can check it out below.
The second phase of his scaling plan was when he built the Magnifying Transmitter. He built this at his laboratory in Colorado Springs.
This was essentially a larger version of the Tesla Coil. Using it as an analogy, the first tower represents the primary coil, and the second tower represents the secondary coil.
Finally, the third phase of his scaling was to take it global. He planned and built out the Wardenclyffe Tower in New York.
However, this version failed and was eventually taken down in 1917, but we’re getting ahead of ourselves. Let’s take a look at what needed to happen before Tesla came up with his very first demonstration; the Tesla Coil.
Historical Beginnings
To explain Tesla’s journey towards global wireless energy transfer, there are a few key points in history and inventions that we need to go over first.
The first key invention is that of the battery in the 1780s. Two physicists, Galvani and Volta, conducted an experiment. I talk about the entire process in my article about the physics behind wireless energy transfer. I’ve linked it below.
Following the battery, a Danish physicist named Hans Christian Ørsted learned that a moving electric current creates a magnetic field. His discovery was the first to find the link between electricity and magnetism. He demonstrated this in a lecture in 1820.
Perhaps the most important invention hereafter for the Tesla Coil is the electromagnet. In 1826, William Sturgeon, an English physicist, discovered that electric current running through a wire coiled around an iron bar caused the iron bar to behave like a magnet.
He fittingly named this the electromagnet.
A few years later in 1831, a man named Michael Faraday wondered if he could make electricity with magnets. So, he used electromagnets. Faraday is most well known for discovering electromagnetic induction.
He used two separate coils wrapped around one iron ring and noticed that when he attached/disconnected a battery to the first wire, the second wire would get a jolt of electricity. He called this inducing a current.
This phenomenon is explained using Faraday’s Law of Induction, which states that:
a changing magnetic field will induce an electromotive force (EMF) in a loop of wire, where EMF is what causes electrons to move and form a current
At this point, all of the components necessary to conceive of the Tesla Coil had been invented, but the background doesn’t end here.
What Was Innovated?
Following Faraday’s discovery of induction, Nicholas Callan, an Irish priest, wanted to improve Faraday’s device.
He decided to wind both the primary and secondary coils around the same iron bar while keeping them electrically separate. Doing this allowed him to feel electrical jolts from wire that had not been directly connected to a battery!
He also found that if the primary wire, the one connected to the battery, was thick and that the secondary wire was thin and had been coiled more, the jolt produced was more powerful.
If the secondary coil has fewer loops than the primary coil, the result is more current and less voltage. However, Callan’s made a secondary coil with more loops than the primary coil, so the result was more voltage and less current.
Callan’s device was named the Step-Up Transformer. When he connected the battery to a coil, it became an electromagnet with a magnetic field. When he disconnected the battery, it lost its magnetic field.
Using Faraday’s Law, every time Callan connected or disconnected, he created a new current in the second coil of wire. He also used a wheel to mechanically connect and disconnect the battery, acting as a kind of “repeater.”
Though this version was later improved by William Sturgeon, Callan’s device was used for electroshock therapy for many years.
The biggest advancement thereafter was using the coil itself to disconnect and connect to the battery instead of using the wheel. How did this work?
Well, the current running through the primary coil caused it to behave like a bar magnet. The wire carrying the current was then connected to a switch so that it could pull on it and activate a spring in the circuit.
The movement of the spring would turn off the current. However, once the connection was removed, the primary coil would no longer be magnetic. This causes the spring to disconnect, and the switch to turn back on.
An Electrical Interrupter
This process of the switch turning on and off would click about 20 to 40 times per second and was named an electrical interrupter.
There was still room for innovation.
The electrical interrupter would sometimes spark. So, in 1853 a man named Armand Fizau created the Leyden Jar to absorb the spark. It was the first version of a capacitor.
This is something made of two large conducting materials separated by insulating material.
By adding the capacitor and getting rid of the spark, Fizau created a new device — one that took DC from a battery and made bursts of AC in the 1850s.
Though not necessary to understanding the Tesla Coil, I’ll mention too that in 1886, Heinrich Hertz added an antenna to the induction coil and created the first man-made radio wave.
This is where Tesla comes in.
Tesla’s Take
Having heard of the radio waves created by Hertz, Tesla visited the World Fair in Paris, 1889. He began tinkering with the induction coil. Among other things, he removed the interrupter and DC battery and replaced it with an AC generator.
This makes sense — why use a battery and mechanical switch to turn the current on and off when a generator that automatically switches the current’s direction could be used instead?
Though this first adaptation didn’t actually work out at the end (due to overheating and melting of wire insulation) it did lead to Tesla’s use of a spark or air gap.
With a few other tweaks, we finally arrive at the original version of the Tesla Coil which looked something like this:
The Original Tesla Coil Circuit Uses Capacitors and Spark Gaps
The modern version, which is what I recreated in my video, is slightly simpler. It no longer uses capacitors or spark gaps and looks like this:
Modern Version of the Tesla Coil Circuit
P.S. for an explanation of how electromagnetic induction works in the modern circuitry, watch my video linked near the beginning of this article.
Nikola Tesla wirelessly lit up a bulb in the year 1891 using his coil, but as I said earlier, his dream was to send wireless power over large distances by using the earth.
After the Tesla Coil worked, he built the larger version that I mentioned earlier called the Magnifying transmitter. It was able to light up three incandescent bulbs at 100ft or 30metres away.
Following his second success, he built the Wardenclyffe Tower in Long Island in 1901. He wanted to use the tower to harness the energy that he thought was inside Earth, in the hopes of turning our planet into a gigantic dynamo.
The tower would take energy from a coal-power generator and send it deep into the ground with a metal rod. He thought that the Earth’s crust would transport the energy.
The tower, however, was considered a failure, was taken down in 1917 and never finished. There are many speculations as to why it didn’t work, some more sound than others, of course.
The article I’ve linked below does a great job of explaining some of the flaws of the tower and how Tesla tried to address
There’s a lot left for us to develop when it comes to modern-day wireless energy transfer. We’ve only scratched the service, even with other methods like radio wave transmission and inductive coupling. To read more about how wireless energy transfer looks now, read this article I wrote.
TLDR;
Previous inventions including the battery, electromagnet, induction theory and capacitors were all necessary precursors to the Tesla Coil
Tesla’s ideation of the coil is based on the principles of electromagnetic induction — a form of wireless energy transfer that we continue to build on now with things like wireless phone charging plates etc.
He tried to scale the coil by building the Magnifying Transmitter then the Wardenclyffe Tower
If you enjoyed this article, be sure to give it a few ????s and follow me on Medium!
Black monolith on the moon. 2001: A Space Odyssey, Universal Pictures
2001: A Space Odyssey, Universal Pictures 1/4
Black monolith in orbit around Jupiter. 2001: A Space Odyssey, Universal Pictures
1/4
NASA Photos show that the Monolith in Utah's Red Rock Desert may have visited the Red Planet just 4 years ago.
Wikipedia 1/4
The Mars monolith is a rectangular object discovered on the surface of Mars. It is located near the bottom of a cliff, from which it likely fell. The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter took pictures of it from orbit, roughly 180 miles away.
2001: A Space Odyssey, Universal Pictures 1/4
Black monolith on the moon. 2001: A Space Odyssey, Universal Pictures
2001: A Space Odyssey, Universal Pictures 1/4
Black monolith in orbit around Jupiter. 2001: A Space Odyssey, Universal Pictures
1/4
NASA Photos show that the Monolith in Utah's Red Rock Desert may have visited the Red Planet just 4 years ago.
Wikipedia 1/4
The Mars monolith is a rectangular object discovered on the surface of Mars. It is located near the bottom of a cliff, from which it likely fell. The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter took pictures of it from orbit, roughly 180 miles away.
Apparently the silver Monolith discovered in Utah's Red Rock desert is part of a family of monoliths, distributed throughout our Solar System by another civilization for some unknown purpose. Either that or it's moving around through our solar system, phasing into different locations at different times.
The monolith (or monoliths), has previously been sighted by Nasa's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on Mars and one of its moons, Phobos.
The Mars monolith is a rectangular object discovered on the surface of Mars. It is located near the bottom of a cliff, from which it likely fell. The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter took pictures of it from orbit, roughly 180 miles away.
This of course calls to mind the 2001: A Space Odyssey, where a black monolith is found buried on the moon. Then an astronaut named Dave travels to Jupiter, only to find a black monolith in orbit for thousands of years.
The Phobos monolith was a large pillar located on the surface of Mars's moon Phobos. It measured about 279 ft across and 300 feet in height--significantly bigger than the Utah Monolith.
The Mars monolith is a bright object near Stickney crater, described as a "building sized" boulder, which casts a prominent shadow. It was discovered by Efrain Palermo, who did extensive surveys of Martian probe imagery, and later confirmed by Lan Fleming, an imaging sub-contractor at NASA Johnson Space Center.
"A monolith is a geological feature consisting of a single massive piece of rock. Monoliths also occur naturally on Earth, but it has been suggested that the Phobos monolith may be a piece of impact ejecta," claims Wikipedia. But we know better.
The general vicinity of Phobos' monolith is a proposed landing site by Optech and the Mars Institute, for a robotic mission to Phobos known as PRIME (Phobos Reconnaissance and International Mars Exploration).
The PRIME mission would be composed of an orbiter and lander, and each would carry four instruments designed to study various aspects of Phobos' geology. At present, PRIME has not been funded and does not have a projected launch date. Former astronaut Buzz Aldrin has spoken about the Phobos monolith and his support for a mission to Phobos.
The object appears in Mars Global Surveyor images SPS252603 and SPS255103, dated 1998. The object may be related to another monolith located on the surface of Mars, which NASA noted as an example of a common surface feature in that region. In fact, all three monoliths may be related structures left by an unknown civilization, for us Earthlings to discover and wonder about. Or perhaps they're just rocks.
Apr 15: Well, yes, Italy is obviously a 'big-foot'...
...hence the recent deep impact (killer quake) there, confirming our suspicion for the Orange/MLK window.
In that strikingly boot-shaped peninsula with its famous resident the 'Monkey King' - Pope aka Primate of Rome - was a direct continuation of our 'Bigfoot' super theme (closely tracked since last summer) and you could see it coming (as we did as early as December on STRUG) based on the multicontextual framework of this period which I'll go into in my upcoming full-length article.
A little more on MLK (continuing from previous posts)...
'MLK' can linguistically denote 'Moloch', closely associated with human/child sacrifice as well as 'king' (as in Martin Luther King, 'Orange King', etc.) which is the meaning of 'Moloch', written mlk (MLK) in Hebrew. Something to keep in mind as we go into May.
Apr 25: It was Venus in the mirror. 'Amor' (son of Venus) meaning 'love' is 'Roma' (Rome) spelt backwards. Hence the planet Venus mirrored (reversed) across the Sun from one Bigfoot day to another...
The Kentucky Derby coming up should be interesting BTW, if a little cryptic.
First, the summer of 2001 was, like in 2003, marked by a Martian close encounter. It was during June, instead of August, that the Mars 'flyby' took place. Not as spectacular as that of 2003, but the Red Planet was a prominent light in the night sky. On June 13-14 (2001), Mars was at 'opposition' (i.e. 180 degrees away from the Sun) and it made its closest approach to Earth several days later on June 21.
Mars Opposition (June 2001)
On the same day, June 21, there was a total solar eclipse - as if to commemorate the Martian visit. In fact, June 21 was even the day of summer solstice (midsummer)!
So, while not as historic, the 2001 Mars opposition closely preceding the events of 9/11 was spectacular - or in hindsight 'ominous' - in its own way.
It still 'missed' 9/11 by about 3 months... Actually, it did not miss. It hit the bull's-eye perfectly - in a coded form:
September 11Gregorian corresponds to 'Thoth 1' (New Year's Day) of the Egyptian calendar which was originally marked by the heliacal/dawn rising of Sirius. In the early phase of the ancient Egyptian civilization the Sirius rising (accompanied by the annual Nile flood) coincided with the summer solstice. It was a 'magical' day that the Egyptians naturally used to anchor their calendar. So by highlighting June 21 (i.e. Gregorian summer solstice), the special Mars opposition event in 2001 conceptually pinpointed September 11, the historical/Egyptian summer-solstice date!
On 9/11, there was another remarkable combination of summer solstice, Mars, and the Moon (i.e. all the key players of the June 21 alignment except the Sun). As the earthshaking events of 9/11 were unfolding on the planet, up in the heavens was observed the following configuration: 1) the Moon was at the summer-solstice point (i.e. where the Sun would be on the midsummer day); 2) Mars was positioned exactly 180 degrees away from the Moon on the opposite side of the sky, closely marking the winter-solstice point; and 3) consequently there was a tight Mars-Earth-Moon alignment bridging the two solstice points!
As the above illustrations show, the solstice points today are neatly indicated by the intersections of the apparent path of the Sun ('ecliptic', green line) and the Milky Way ('galactic equator', blue band). This arrangement is coincidental/temporary and is thus astronomically quite special. Some view these points as something akin to 'stargates'.
Now, the prophetic quality of all this dramatically increases as we progress forward (from 9/11/01). Mars opposition occurs approximately every 26 months, so the Sun-Earth-Mars alignment would be established again in the summer of 2003 - specifically on Aug. 28. As already discussed, it seemed to have 'anticipated' the 'Martian' event of Schwarzenegger entering politics on August 6. The same type of code was used here since Aug. 6 is or represents the actual day on which Sirius' heliacal rising occurs in our epoch. Through Sirius, June 21, Sept. 11, and Aug. 6 are but different expressions of the same archetypal date!
This calendrical link is reinforced by one of Schwarzenegger's nicknames being 'The Oak'. In pagan tradition, the 'Oak King' is associated with midsummer which is also reflected in the fact that the Christian version of the Oak King, John the Baptist, has his feast day on June 24, intended to mark the summer solstice (~June 21).
Similarly, Jesus Christ's birthday is celebrated on Christmas in mid-December to mark the winter solstice. The summer and winter solstices represent two opposite calendrical/spatial points. This makes John the Baptist (Oak King) the anti-Jesus, or 'anti-Christ'. Hence Schwarzenegger 'The Oak', whose political rise on Aug. 6 was marked by the Sirius rising associated with midsummer, would also share the ominous epithet. And why not, he's already the 'Terminator'... after all.
Bruno Mars and Red Hot Chili Peppers doing the halftime show
One of the teams was the Denver Broncos from "Colorado" which means "color red"
Though technically in New Jersey, the Super Bowl was essentially in New York City (MetLife Stadium), or the "Big Apple"... as in the Golden Apple (MetLife Stadium is the home of both the New York Giants and New York Jets); "Golden Apple" is synonymous with "Cydonia"
NYC/MetLife Stadium is at latitude ~40.8°N, exactly the same latitude as the "Monuments"of Cydonia on Mars including the "Face on Mars"
The "Golden Apple" allusion represents a time arrow pointing ahead to the "Golden Apple Alignment" in mid Octoberright before Martian (almost) Deep Impact day.
[NOTE: Orange/Golden Apple Alignments are typically (but not always) time markers for major "earth changes" events such as earthquakes, as well as papal events, etc. And it's been my observation after nearly a decade of closely tracking these alignments that when Earth joins an Orange Alignment, the energy is amplified. That's what we'll have with the upcoming Orange/Golden Apple Alignment (mid Oct 2014).]
The Cydonia/Face on Mars allusion is even more revealing... starting with the fact that the Face can transform into a (reverse) sphinx, with a lion head and a human (pregnant) body:
In the sky, the Great Sphinx has a counterpart in the form of the constellation Leo. And there was a remarkable "omen" there earlier this year, right on the vernal/March equinox (March 20)... or the exact day the gaze of the Great Sphinxaligned with sunrise.
Late July-Early August 2017 Window By Goro July 23, 2017
Watching late July-early August 2017 is like watching a monster sunspot on the Sun, waiting for a big explosion. Lots temporal/multicontextual energy building up and ready to pop via an intense convergence of multiple time markers including a Mayan golden ratio timeline coming from two back-to-back "Deep Impact" events in early July 2005, as well as a "Lucifer Alignment" (Venus-Sun-Jupiter) with a very consistent and ominous track record. Each of them is capable of producing a powerful "X-class flare" independently but here we got two monster "sunspots" together, ready to erupt with their combined force. So... heads up.
Mayan Deep Impact Phi Echo
I use a couple of highly-charged temporal anchor points from the past with this time code:
1) Early July 2015: Two back-t-back "Deep Impact" events above and below
[NASA Deep Impact smacking a comet]
[London deadly terror bombings]
2) December 21, 2012: The "end" of the Mayan calendar
Together and via the golden ratio they pinpoint the future window July 31-August 2, 2017:
Note: The Mayan calendar "end date" has a good track record with this type of time codes especially with the golden ratio. Why I keep using them.
Lucifer Alignment
This one is a heliocentric alignment involving Venus, the Sun and Jupiter (i.e. either Sun-Venus-Jupiter or Venus-Sun-Jupiter). Until a few years ago what I call the "Orange/Golden Apple Alignment" (Venus-Sun-Mercury) had the same level of energy and consistency. Now the torch has been passed to the "Lucifer Alignment". Its track record speaks for itself:
The Rio Olympics, the start of the Trump-Russia affair and the cyber warfare chaos affecting the US election. Plus the Trump campaign in major turmoil.
That's where we are with the "Lucifer Alignment" sequence. This is a powerful pattern that hasn't skipped a beat so far and this time it's amplified by a Mayan Deep Impact phi "shock wave" (plus some other things), making late July-early August one of the most intense windows of 2017.
It's a monster "sunspot". It won't necessarily erupt but it certainly harbors enough energy for an "X-class flare". We can probably expect some dramatic fireworks before the Great American Total Solar Eclipse coming up on August 21st. The eclipse will be by far the biggest celestial event of the year of course and as those in the members area ( STRUG) know the symbolic depth and intensity of the eclipse is off the charts.
We are crossing a major Threshold in 2017. Into a new reality...
Oh, and there is also a big change coming soon that you're not expecting.
Want more rapid and in-depth updates? Jump to the...
2) December 21, 2012: The "end" of the Mayan calendar
Together and via the golden ratio they pinpoint the future window July 31-August 2, 2017:
Note: The Mayan calendar "end date" has a good track record with this type of time codes especially with the golden ratio. Why I keep using them.
Lucifer Alignment
This one is a heliocentric alignment involving Venus, the Sun and Jupiter (i.e. either Sun-Venus-Jupiter or Venus-Sun-Jupiter). Until a few years ago what I call the "Orange/Golden Apple Alignment" (Venus-Sun-Mercury) had the same level of energy and consistency. Now the torch has been passed to the "Lucifer Alignment". Its track record speaks for itself:
الفقرة السابقة
Apr 03 
