RIEMANN (GEOMETRIA NO EUCLIDEANA) (NEXO TRANSFIGURACION) - FORO LIBREPENSADOR SIN CENSURA

Quote:

In fact the Riemann crumpled paper ball has all three type of geometric curvatures in his structure.

Why I like Dirk and his website.
His site >> explanation of the Riemann geometry.
http://www.mu6.com/riemann_space.html
So I googled Bernard Riemann.
Please note the year of the Riemann theorem got its start, when the SEED was planted.
It was NOT 1854.

Quote:

Euclidean geometry versus Riemannian geometry
In 1853, Gauss asked his student Riemann to prepare a Habilitationsschrift on the foundations of geometry. Over many months, Riemann developed his theory of higher dimensions. When he finally delivered his lecture at Göttingen in 1854, the mathematical public received it with enthusiasm, and it is one of the most important works in geometry.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernhard_Riemann
Riemann's idea was to introduce a collection of numbers at every point in space that would describe how much it was bent or curved. Riemann found that in four spatial dimensions, one needs a collection of ten numbers at each point to describe the properties of a manifold, no matter how distorted it is. This is the famous Riemann curvature tensor.

So in 1853 GauSS (never heard of him :lol:

) asked Riemann to prepare a paper on the foundations of geometry?

Again I must ask myself ... who is the author of the unity I see?
Those numbers appear rather dramatically...funny that Dirk (a toy inventor) who references the Kabbalah lead me to Riemann who lead me back to fundamental elemental number 17, an Arabian alchemist named Gabir (Gerber?) and the Lo Shu magic square?

So where/how/why does the Lo Shu which is profoundly connected to the I Ching (and the number 64) enter the narrative?

Please read pages 9, 10, 11, and 12:
http://books.google.ca/books?id=E6CnrdK ... 7#PPA11,M1
After reading page 12...tell me if you see the numbers 1853?
:lol:

Actually above is a MUST READ re: 17 and Lo Shu magic.
1853 = 9/8 = 17

the following are just thoughts...
So I will let you digest the above re: Riemann and 1853 = 17 and the Lo Shu and number 17 and CARD X 11258.
Then find in the Lo Shu and add the number 2, to the series 1, 3, 5, 8.
What shape do you see?
Do you see the outline of the ODAL rune?
What numbers are missing from the series 1, 2, 3, 5, and 8 necessary to complete the Fibonacci series?
0 and 1?
Is that where MAN tinkers and manipulates using binary code, using 0 and 1?

Lee who is the author?
Obviously everything I present is 'factual' based on the 'fractuals'?
:lol:

I never did continue with this thread, written in August 2008:
viewtopic.php?p=81362#p81362

Thus we will keep finding connections (because we do take the time to look, lucky us), more and more archetypal truths that MUST EXIST and TRANSCEND our man made illusions, that keep going bust?
Because we ignore the patterns?
:wink:

namaste

Raphael