|
General: ANGELS AND DEMONS TOM HANKS WEARS A MICKEY MOUSE WATCH DISNEY
Elegir otro panel de mensajes |
|
Watching Movies Tom Hanks Wears A Mickey Mouse Watch In 'Angels & Demons'
Everyone's favorite deputy trades in his Pixar ID for a Disney one.
Based on Dan “DaVinci Code” Brown’s bestselling novel of the same name, Angels & Demons (2009) follows the exploits of Robert Langdon (played by Tom Hanks) as he gallivants across Rome and the Vatican trying to foil the murderous exploits of the secret society known as the Illuminati. With his slicked-back-hair and action-movie pedigree, Langdon is reminiscent of Nic Cage’s character Benjamin Franklin Gates in National Treasure – only Langdon doesn't wear a Rolex. His wristwatch is far more playful.
Image courtesy, Columbia Pictures
It's the final day of Character Watch Week! If you haven't read our coverage ranging from Pokemon to the Black Panther, be sure to check it out. We even ranked our favorite Mickey Mouse watches of all time, which is where Robert Langdon comes into play. He may very well be one of the top minds in the field of art history and symbology (he's a Harvard professor, after all), but he doesn't let that get to his wrist.
While he most certainly has the means for all manner of luxury watches, he opts for a timepiece more fitting for a rumpled professor. That would be a Mickey Mouse watch, complete with moving arms that tell the time. (Happy now, Jack?)
Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks) with the Vatican police, trying to solve the mysteries of the Illuminati with his Mickey Mouse watch. Screengrab courtesy, Columbia Pictures
Langdon's watch is an unassuming variation on the longstanding Mickey tradition. It's small and fitted to a black leather strap with the literal words "Mickey" and "Mouse" printed vertically on the dial. The history of these watches is long (and still continuing) but it dates back to the early 1930s, when the Ingersoll watch company (which would one day become Timex) unveiled a Mickey Mouse pocket watch – later followed up by the wristwatch which has been iterated on countless times over the years. Langdon's appears to be a Bradley Mickey Mouse watch, specifically.
Similar Bradley Mickey Mouse watch to the one worn by Tom Hanks in Angels & Demons. Image courtesy, Goodwill
This is a character watch no matter how you want to define the category. But the question lingers: Why does he wear this? Why not choose a more rugged timepiece fit for his continent-hopping adventures? While we don't find that answer in the movie, we do find it in the pages of Dan Brown's novels.
In The DaVinci Code, we learn about Langdon's history with the watch:
"Pulling back the sleeve of his jacket, he checked his watch – a vintage, collector's-edition Mickey Mouse wristwatch that had been a gift from his parents on his tenth birthday. Although its juvenile dial often drew odd looks, Langdon had never owned any other watch; Disney animations had been his first introduction to the magic of form and color, and Mickey now served as Langdon's daily reminder to stay young at heart. At the moment, however, Mickey's arms were skewed at an awkward angle, indicating an equally awkward hour."
Langdon, alongside CERN scientist Vittoria Vetra (played by Ayelet Zurer), in Angels & Demons. Screengrab courtesy, Columbia Pictures
It goes even deeper than that, believe it or not, and you can read the book for yourself if you want additional context. We're interested in the movie that brings the watch to life. And since Langdon's watch is covered up throughout The DaVinci Code movie, that brings us to Angels & Demons.
Nearly an hour into the film, Langdon is hot on the trail of the Illuminati's plans. Alongside Vittoria Vetra (Ayelet Zurer) – a CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research) scientist, and the Vatican police – he arrives at St. Peter's Square hoping to catch the secret society in the act of wrongdoing. The setting is teeming with tourists, news trucks, and reporters. As he makes his way through the crowd, Langdon takes a moment to check the time [00:54:10]. This is when we get the money shot. Underneath his blue dress shirt sits a vintage Mickey Mouse watch, with its active hands busy telling the time. You don't often get such overt watch shots in films – and never a Mickey Mouse watch – but it jives with the absolute lack of subtlety at large on the part of this movie franchise
Screengrab courtesy, Columbia Pictures
In the third act, Langdon convinces the Italian police force to take him to the Piazza Navona where he's certain the Illuminati are planning to brand and murder a Cardinal. When they arrive on the scene, they see a suspicious van pull up and turn its lights off. The police make their way over to the van to investigate and are immediately taken out by an assassin (who happens to be wearing a two-tone Rolex Datejust). The assassin proceeds to wheel the Cardinal out from the van, on a rig with bench press weights attached and drop him into a fountain. Langdon jumps in – eventually aided by good samaritans and manages to save the drowning Cardinal. All the while he has his Mickey Mouse watch on [00:01:30], which becomes visible as he rests his drenched arm on the outside of the fountain. There's no way this watch has that kind of water resistance but … movie magic right?
Screengrab courtesy, Columbia Pictures
Angels & Demons (starring Tom Hanks and Ewan McGregor) is directed by Ron Howard, with props by Trish Gallaher Glenn, and Federico Ciommo. It's available to stream on Netflix and rent on iTunes or Amazon.
Lead image courtesy, Columbia Pictures
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/tom-hanks-wears-a-mickey-mouse-watch-in-angels-and-demons |
|
|
|
Artistic Genius – Leonardo daVinci and Walt Disney
Posted 12 years ago
Artistic Genius – Leonardo daVinci and Walt Disney
Our society is moving toward a view of artistic genius that’s both new and old. It’s new in the sense that truly incredible tools and technologies are now available for creative work. It’s old because our present view of the artist’s place in society has much more in common with the Middle Ages or the Renaissance than with the 19th or early 20th centuries. To make this clear, and to help you connect with the creative elements in your own character — which you may or may not have recognized in the past — our focus in this session is on two true geniuses who really exemplified the times in which they lived. One of these men is Leonardo daVinci who, along with Michelangelo, is generally recognized as the quintessential artist of the Renaissance. Our second artistic genius is Walt Disney — and he occupies more or less the same position in our time that Leonardo occupied in his. Disney was the Leonardo of the 20th century. Here at the start of the 21st century, we’re getting rid of the idea that a creative person is someone who wears a beret and lives in a garret. The model of the isolated artist won’t work anymore — and neither will the model of the corporate person who wants to work forty years for one company and then collect a big pension. In this sense, both Leonardo and Disney are probably much more relevant to the circumstance of your life than you might think. Leonardo was born in the small Italian town of Vinci, in the year 1452. He began life with certain obvious advantages, and also some disadvantages. His father was a rather wealthy country gentleman. His mother, however, was a servant girl whom his father had no intention of marrying. In later life he would describe himself as a “man with no education.” When he was about 14 years old, Leonardo was sent to Florence to become an apprentice in the studio of a prominent artist. The artist’s name was Andrea del Verrocchio, and he was both a painter and a sculptor. Leonardo learned a lot from this first master. And around 1470, after being with Verrocchio for about four years, Leonardo got a big break. He was assigned to paint an angel in the corner of one of Verrocchio’s major commissioned works. According to legend, when Verrocchio saw the angel he realized it was infinitely better than the rest of the painting. In fact, it was so much better than anything Verrocchio had ever done that he gave up painting forever, right then and there. This legend may or may not be true, but the young artist from the countryside was definitely on his way. In 1901, about 450 years after the birth of Leonardo, Walt Disney was born in Chicago, Illinois. His home life and childhood were far from the idealized turn of the century landscape he would later create at Disneyland. His father in particular was a difficult man emotionally, and an unsuccessful one financially. Walt found a couple of different ways to escape from this environment. First, he escaped into art, taking classes and drawing whenever he could. Second, he enlisted in the Red Cross ambulance service during the First World War, because at the age of 16 he was too young to join the regular army. After the war, Disney went to Kansas City, and began a career as a commercial artist. There he discovered animation, and the all the possibilities it offered for creating an alternate world. At first, this world was constructed out of pure imagination. Later it would be projected onto movie screens and television — and ultimately it would become physical reality at Disneyland and Disney World. It would become the basis for a multi-billion dollar entertainment empire. Right now, as the most basic element of modeling artistic genius, I’d like you to recognize exactly what artistic genius is. It’s simply taking a picture that’s in your heart and using some medium to move it into the hearts of other people. It doesn’t matter what that picture is, and — at least initially — it doesn’t matter how technically adept you are with the medium you’ve chosen. Leonardo had incredible technical skill. His ability for drawing and sculpture was truly superhuman, and he was also extremely adept at the mechanical and engineering tasks demanded by large scale creative work. Walt Disney had nothing like Leonardo’s gifts as an artist. There were thousands of people who could draw better than Walt Disney — and when he entered the new field of animation, there were lots of people who were better at that as well. When we look back on it today, it’s easy to think that Mickey Mouse was some sort of breakthrough creation that was destined to revolutionize the world. But there were other cartoon characters that were already very popular, and that were just as charming and creative as the Mouse. For example, what was wrong with Felix the Cat? Why is he forgotten today? Why wasn’t there a television show called the Felix the Cat Club instead of the Mickey Mouse Club? One big difference, perhaps the big difference, was that behind Mickey Mouse there was a personality whose genius was to take this very little mouse and to make it extremely large. To take something that at first had no substance — no reality — and to give it material being on a scale that kept getting larger and larger. For your own life, the example of Disney as artistic genius is especially relevant. While it’s possible that you may patent thousands of inventions or become president of the United States, the odds are against it, but on a smaller scale, the tools of artistic genius are always available to you. What does it take to use those tools? It’s simply a matter of taking the vision that’s in your mind and moving it into the world in some tangible form. It’s taking your vision one step beyond just talking about how you’ll write it or record it or film it “when you get time.” Taking that step is the essence of artistic genius. Don’t worry about whether your creation will be seen by one person, or a million people, or just by you alone. Focusing on those things — like saying you “don’t have the time” — is just an unconscious way to avoid actually doing anything. The important thing is to separate yourself from the many, many people who tell me they’ve got something they want to say, but who never get around to saying it. Thank you for joining me in this discussion of artistic genius, and of how it expressed itself in two very different personalities across the centuries.
Artistic Genius – Leonardo daVinci and Walt Disney | Assessments 24x7 |
|
|
|
https://es.slideshare.net/Pritiba/use-of-symbols-science-and-art-in-the-da-vinci-code-novel-by-dan-brown |
|
|
|
Robert Zemeckis to direct Disney's long-developing live-action Pinocchio remake
Published on January 24, 2020 07:37PM EST
PHOTO: MICHAEL KOVAC/GETTY IMAGES; EVERETT COLLECTION
Robert Zemeckis wished upon the right star.
The Back to the Future filmmaker has closed a deal to direct Disney's live-action remake of Pinocchio, EW has confirmed. Zemeckis will also co-write a new draft of the screenplay with Chris Weitz (the writer of 2015's Cinderella), who is producing the film as well.
This comes on the heels of the news that Disney has a photorealistic Bambi remake in the works. Taken together, these developments suggest that the Mouse House is making a substantial effort to emotionally scar a new generation of kids: 1940's Pinocchio, after all, is known as one of the most demented Disney films in the canon. (Between the kids turning into donkeys, its hero getting locked in a cage, and a few of the studio's most grotesque villains, the movie has been giving kids a flood of nightmares for almost 80 years now.)
The Pinocchio remake has taken a relatively long and bumpy road to the screen. The project was first announced in 2015, and has seen both 1917's Sam Mendes and Paddington's Paul King join and then depart as director. Tom Hanks was reportedly in talks to play Pinocchio's "father" Geppetto in 2018; it's unclear if he is still attached to the film.
Zemeckis is currently directing a new adaptation of Roald Dahl's The Witches, starring Anne Hathaway and Octavia Spencer, for Warner Bros. That film will hit theaters Oct. 9. Pinocchio does not yet have a release date.
Related content:
|
|
|
|
‘Pinocchio’ Review: Tom Hanks Can’t Save Robert Zemeckis’ Latest Soulless, Weird, Uncanny Valley Effort
September 8, 2022 9:32 Am
Here’s one hell of a way to remember just how strange “Pinocchio” (1940) was: watch Robert Zemeckis’ hallucinatory live-action remake of it, now playing on Disney+. Some of the kooky parts here are not from the script by Simon Farnaby and Chris Weitz—to their credit, they didn’t invent the hedonistic sugary kid-hell of Pleasure Island, or the concept of an innocent boy whose wooden appendage grows, or a lonely man’s fixation on having a manic pixie dream son (Italian author Carlo Collodi did). But Zemeckis and company do repeat all of those notes, and add more strangeness of their own, while giving us another lifeless live-action adaptation from the factory that’s inside the Disney vault.
Zemeckis’ “Pinocchio” is a smattering of confusing decisions and inappropriate gestures for family entertainment, with an uncanny nature that starts with the talking wooden doll: he’s a direct CGI adaptation of the animated version as if this were “Space Jam: A New Legacy.” This Pinocchio (voiced by Benjamin Evan Ainsworth) has a fixed smile line on his mouth, drawn on by his master Gepetto, like a clown doll you wouldn’t want to be left in a dark room with. Figaro, the black and white shop kitty? Still adorable. Jiminy Cricket, voiced by Joseph Gordon-Levitt, like he’s trying to win a Cliff Edwards impersonation contest? Fine. But Pinocchio? Even more unsettling.
READ MORE: Fall 2022 Preview: 60+ Must-See Films To Watch
Then there’s the moment when this Pinocchio—before he goes off to school, which then becomes an adventure through the perils of showbiz, root beer temptation, and a sea monster’s belly—gets on his wooden hands and knees and smells a pile of shit. “I can’t wait to get to school and learn what all this stuff is!” he excitedly remarks. Do we really need to see that—like when Norman Bates is shown masturbating in Gus Van Sant’s remake of “Psycho”—to understand Pinocchio’s naïveté? It’s touches like that that make “Pinocchio” far more unhinged than it is emotionally grabbing, when its soul wants to be both, always with a permanent smile on its face.
In less glaring moments of Zemeckis still trying to get through some “Welcome to Marwen” irreverent doll humor out of his system, he treats the journey of Pinocchio as a set of thrill rides, so at least the pacing is commendable. There are numerous scenes of characters being zipped away, riding through something like the confectionary terrain of Sugar Mountain on Pleasure Island, or later when our heroes are racing to the end of the sea beast’s closing mouth. There are a couple of peppy original music numbers from Alan Silvestri and Glen Ballard, which prove to be the best place for Kyanne Lamaya’s endearing new character Fabiana to charm Pinocchio with her own marionette and dreams. (And for those Silvestri heads out there, his score is maybe sending some type of call for help by borrowing notes from his theme to “Mac and Me.”)
The big selling point for this live-action remake must be that it has Tom Hanks as woodcarver Gepetto, here with a bushy mustache and accent that booms every O in “Pinocchiooo!” as he celebrates and then searches for the wooden boy who goes missing on the way to school. But his sad muttering to himself doesn’t create the emotional tissue this version needs, especially when it adds an element of loss that’s different than the original’s Gepetto’s feeling of “It would be nice if he were a real boy.” You just feel so little for this version of Pinocchio or the human father who pines for him to return.
For all the talk about the uncanny valley that has followed Zemeckis’ films—with characters that aren’t believable enough to the human eye—“Pinocchio” does feel like it has passed that visual threshold. Sly entertainment fox Honest John (voiced on a sugar-high by Keegan-Michael Key) is a victorious example of this, with an electric energy, flowing fur, and clattering jaw. It’s hard to imagine a tall fox in a top hat looking any more realistic in a mostly live-action story.
But now it’s the storytelling that has reached an uncanniness here; this “Pinocchio” takes place in a world far stranger because of its high-def clarity, and it feels unnatural even for a fantasy. It makes the movie challenging to access in the lightest terms, and only little tidbits get out alive: Cynthia Erivo, as the new Blue Fairy, gives a rousing rendition of “When You Wish Upon a Star” as if it had been written for her. The practical sets are eye-popping, too, like the stages built for Pleasure Island, where kids smash clocks and record hateful videos while Luke Evans (as The Coachmaster) pops up to hand them root beer.
“Pinocchio,” released on Disney+ Day, is meant to be a wistful return to the moment in which “When You Wish Upon a Star” offered the melodic motif that now ushers in any Disney movie and became a company credo. Gepetto even has cuckoo clocks made of countless Disney and Pixar references, as if his humble workshop were the center of a universe. But instead of providing Disney peacefulness, it offers a bizarre moment of reflection: on both the questionable, ingrained Disney innocence of the past and what happens when these live-action movies repeat these elements with a cult-like sense of faithfulness and duty. This “Pinocchio” is real, and it’s real weird. [C-]
https://theplaylist.net/pinocchio-review-tom-hanks-cant-save-robert-zemeckis-latest-soulless-weird-uncanny-valley-effort-20220908/ |
|
|
Primer
Anterior
4 a 18 de 18
Siguiente
Último
|
|
|
|
©2024 - Gabitos - Todos los derechos reservados | |
|
|