|
|
General: VOYAGER 1 Y 2, PIONEER 10 Y 11 ESTAN AFUERA DEL SISTEMA SOLAR
Elegir otro panel de mensajes |
|
|
 |
Click para ampliar |
 Tomadas por el Voyager 1 en febrero de 1990. En 1990, la Voyager 1 fue más lejos del Sol que Plutón, y aproximadamente 4 millones de kilómetros de la Tierra. Por lo tanto, la NASA dio el Voyager 1 un último encargo y tenía el oficio de tomar las fotos por primera vez de los planetas "fuera" del sistema solar. Esta es una recopilación de los disparos. Esta fue tomada hace 22 años por lo tanto una foto actual seguramente nos daria una perspectiva de todo el sistema solar, pero la Nasa solo emite comentarios al respecto, ya no hay mas imagenes por lo visto. De cualquier forma el dato del componente magnetico externo al sistema solar de 60 grados dice mas que cualquier imagen cuando entendemos el proceso rombicododecaedro del hipercubo. |
|
|
 First Previous 2 to 3 of 3 Next  Last |
|
|
Yes of course ... PIONEER is in fact is part of the 137 narrative!!!
President JC  helped script the message?
| Quote: |
As of 2008, the two Voyager spacecraft became the third and fourth human artifacts to escape entirely from the solar system. Pioneers 10 and 11, which were launched in 1972 and 1973 and preceded Voyager in outstripping the gravitational attraction of the Sun, both carried small metal plaques identifying their time and place of origin for the benefit of any other spacefarers that might find them in the distant future.
With this example before them, NASA placed a more comprehensive (and eclectic) message aboard Voyager 1 and 2—a kind of time capsule, intended to communicate a story of our world to extraterrestrials.
“ This is a present from a small, distant world, a token of our sounds, our science, our images, our music, our thoughts and our feelings. We are attempting to survive our time so we may live into yours. ”
— U.S. President Jimmy Carter |
Whenever I see 37 and 27 used together I think 37+27=DNA and 37/27x100=137 the reciprocal of the fine structure constant.
IF you wanted to communicate with aLIEns you would need to let them know you know about HYDROGEN.
And we know we can place the dimensionless number 137 between the two spectral lines of hydrogen atom.
| Quote: |
At the top of the plaque we have two hydrogen atoms, engaged in some activity called "hyperfine transition." Why the word "hyperfine" never caught on as a superlative amongst teens is beyond me. As near as I can tell, this refers to the fact that hydrogen have two hyperfine states: either the magnetic field of the outermost electron points in the same direction as the magnetic field of the nucleus (i.e., they are "parallel"), or it points in the opposite direction ("antiparallel"). When a hydrogen atom flips from one state to another it is called the hyperfine transition, and the phenomenon releases a photon with a wavelength of 21 centimeters and a frequency of 1420 MHz.
Notice that, in the diagram, the hydrogen atom on the left has the electron (on the line bisecting top of the circle) pointing towards the nucleus (i.e, antiparallel), while the one on the right has the electron pointing away from the nucleus (parallel). The line between the two represents the transition, and the hash mark below symbolizes the change, both in terms of distance (21 centimeters) and time (1420 MHz). This hash mark is the standard unit of measurement -- both for distance and time -- used for the other elements on the plaque
http://www.defectiveyeti.com/archives/000932.html
|
The archetype of two opposite charges/two spectral lines, with a third entity between the two, seen as a balance is maintained.
namaste
_________________
KEY 528=Swastika=ancient Spherical Standing Wave Theory
“A theory is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise, the more different are the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability…”
-Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
Primer
Anterior
2 a 2 de 2
Siguiente
Último
|
|
|
Science: Encounter with Saturn confirms relativity theory
By Marcus Chown
WHEN THE spaceprobe Voyager 1 flew past Saturn in 1980, it not only
observed the planet and its moons but also provided scientists with data
that confirms Einstein’s general theory of relativity. In 1915, Einstein
predicted that light loses energy climbing out of the ‘gravitational well’
of a massive body, such as a planet. The effect is known as the gravitational
red shift, because as light loses energy its frequency is reduced, making
it appear redder.
Voyager 1 was able to test the red shift effect when it flew past Saturn,
using radio signals sent back to Earth by a transmitter locked at a very
precise frequency. The spaceprobe was equipped with an ultrastable crystal
oscillator, known as the USO. This acted as a very precise standard, varying
its frequency by less than 5 parts in 1012. Electronic equipment on board
multiplied the frequency of the oscillator by 120 times, to provide the
frequency of the spaceprobe’s radio transmitter – 2.3 gigahertz. These signals
were then picked up by the radio telescopes of NASA’s Deep Space Network,
which was used to track and control both Voyager spaceprobes.
Now, long after the event, Timothy Krisher and his colleagues at the
Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, have examined the record
of the signal from Voyager 1. The spaceprobe flew within 180 000 kilometres
of Saturn on 12 November 1980. They find that as the spaceprobe moved in
and out of the gravitational field of Saturn, its transmitter’s frequency
dipped. The dip was no more than a few hertz, but it was within 1 per cent
of the prediction of general relativity for a frequency of 2.3 gigahertz.
Fluctuations in the frequency of the transmitter – though very small – nevertheless
prevented the theory from being tested even more severely (Physical Review
Letters, vol 64, p 1322).
Krisher and his colleagues have yet to determine whether data from the
transmitter on board Voyager 2 can help them to test general relativity
further. It was badly affected by intense radiation as it passed by Jupiter
on its way to Saturn and so its data may not be as reliable as the data
from its predecessor. The current results may, however, rule out some alternatives
to Einstein’s theory.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg12517102-600-science-encounter-with-saturn-confirms-relativity-theory/ |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
©2025 - Gabitos - Todos los derechos reservados | |
|
|
Tema anterior
