Scott, from Secrets In Plain Sight has produced another fascinating analysis of numerical measurements and observations. 

Scott produces a scientific analysis of synchronicity in numbers measured almost everywhere observations are done; found throughout the planet, solar system and beyond. The likelihood that these measurement systems were at random only to have them match universal constants discovered later is all but impossible. Cleary the progenitors of modern day and ancient measurement systems understood the essential mathematical nature of the universe. 

The below linked article is a three and a half hour documentary revealing the connections between sacred sights, modern cities  and geological measurements; a showcase of Scott's work. I strongly suggest watching this seminal film, if you are in interested Ley Lines, electromagnetic field connections, wisdom of the ancients, and much more. 

Related UNDENIABLE TRUTH - Secrets in Plain Sight - Great for Beginners

In below article, Earth and Moon connections are explored revealing a reciprocal relationship to within six orders of magnitude. There is no other planet and moon relationship like this else where in the solar system. This is just a small sample of all the peculiar relationships Scott has discovered in his work.

 

The relationship suggest that the Moon may not be a naturally occurring object and could in fact be artificial in nature, towed into place by some highly advanced ancient race of the past. 

Related Could The Moon Be An Ancient Space Ark? | Strange Moon Facts



Source - Secrets In Plain Sight

Physicist Max Tegmark has identified 32 dimensionless ratios that are basic properties of reality in his though-provoking book, Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality. These are 32 pure numbers from which every other fundamental constant of nature can be theoretically derived.

“How far could you rotate the dark-energy knob before the “Oops!” moment? The current setting of the knob, corresponding to the dark-energy density we’ve actually measured, is about 10−27 kilograms per cubic meter, which is almost ridiculously close to zero compared to the available range: the natural maximum value for the dial is a dark-energy density around 1097kilograms per cubic meter, which is when the quantum fluctuations fill space with tiny black holes, and the minimum value is the same with a minus sign in front. If rotating the dark-energy knob…by a full turn would vary the density across the full range, then the actual knob setting for our Universe is about 10−123 of a turn away from the halfway point. That means that if you want to tune the knob to allow galaxies to form, you have to get the angle by which you rotate it right to over 120 decimal places!

…if the electromagnetic force were weakened by a mere 4%, then the Sun would immediately explode as its hydrogen fused into so-called diprotons, an otherwise nonexistent kind of neutron-free helium. If it were significantly strengthened, previously stable atoms such as carbon and oxygen would radioactively decay away.

If the so-called weak nuclear force were substantially weaker, there would be no hydrogen around, since it would all have been converted to helium shortly after our Big Bang. If it were either much stronger or much weaker, the neutrinos from a supernova explosion would fail to blow away the outer parts of the star, and it’s doubtful whether life-supporting heavier elements such as iron would ever be able to leave the stars where they were produced and end up in planets such as Earth.

If electrons were much lighter, there could be no stable stars, and if they were much heavier, there could be no ordered structures such as crystals and DNA molecules. If protons were 0.2% heavier, they’d decay into neutrons unable to hold on to electrons, so there would be no atoms. If they were instead much lighter, then neutrons inside of atoms would decay into protons, so there would be no stable atoms except for hydrogen. Indeed, the proton mass depends on another knob that has a very wide range of variation and needs to be fine-tuned to thirty-three decimal places to get any stable atoms other than hydrogen.

Many of these fine-tuning examples were discovered in the seventies and eighties by Paul Davies, Brandon Carter, Bernard Carr, Martin Rees, John Barrow, Frank Tipler, Steven Weinberg and other physicists. And more examples just kept turning up.”