Did you know the great pyramid is perfect, but they say the top of the pyramid is not in the middle of the square base and has an error of a quarter of a inch lol . but that is because the modern scientists has calculate wrong the Pi number. 
Pi or π is a mathematical constant whose value is the ratio of any circle's circumference to its diameter in Euclidean space; this is the same value as the ratio of a circle's area to the square of its radius. It is approximately equal to 3.14159 in the usual decimal notation (see the table for its representation in some other bases). π is one of the most important mathematical and physical constants: many formulae from mathematics, science, and engineering involve π.
 Circumference = π × diameter

 Area of the circle = π × area of the shaded square

Calculating Pi number 
π can be empirically estimated by drawing a large circle, then measuring its diameter and circumference and dividing the circumference by the diameter. Another geometry-based approach, due to Archimedes,[19] is to calculate the perimeter, Pn , of a regular polygon with n sides circumscribed around a circle with diameter d. Then 

That is, the more sides the polygon has, the closer the approximation approaches π. Archimedes determined the accuracy of this approach by comparing the perimeter of the circumscribed polygon with the perimeter of a regular polygon with the same number of sides inscribed inside the circle. Using a polygon with 96 sides, he computed the fractional range: 


I will say only that his ARCHIMEDES axiom (287-212 BC) resulting from the conclusion that seems logical in our OLD thinking and reference, namely that a circle can be compared and even overlapped with circumscribed polygon with infinite number of sides is not accurate! 


The modern scientist will say to you if you give them the TRUE PI NUMBER "Archimedes established margin that included PI: between 3.1408 (223/71) and 3.1428 (22 / 7), so the your result are not included in this interval, so that is false!"

For the moment all the guys out there uses PI=3.1415(....)
but the true Pi number is 3,1446(...) go and measure on terrain!!! practical !!! 

PI=4/radical(PHI, the golden ratio = 1.61803399(...)) = 3.14460550981492(...) !!! 
 The Golden Ratio!!! 

Facts:
According to the true pi number the diameter of the Large Hadron Collider is smaller with 8.13 meters!
According to the true pi number the GREAT PYRAMID IS P.E.R.F.E.C.T.!!!!!!!
According to the true pi number N.A.S.A. is using the true PI number. lol
According to the true pi number the humans will be able to build more perfect buildings (and durable ffs!!!)
ACCORDING TO THE TRUE PI NUMBER THE MARKO RODIN SINGLE TORUS COIL WILL BE UPGRADED AND MORE EFFICIENT!!! and a little bigger in diameter )

mane, I too have found that this happens. It seems that there is occasional "human error" in some of our already established constraining systems though, and this system really does work them out. The nice thing is it makes thing predictable, and able to be checked easily. This tells me that there is an inerrant amount of truth in this system, which makes me further believe it is correct and not just "coincidental"


LONG RAMBLING POST WARNING.....

This leads to another point that I have started to post several times, but always delete because I cant adequately explain it. I will try again.

I do understand Rodin when he describes this as the "fingerprint of God". What I am beginning to see is that each number has its own rules that it must adhere to. And these numbers define the "flow" from creator to creation. In short, I think Walter Russell adequately described the concept, and I see these concepts repeated with people like Schauberger and Leedskalnin. 

Both of these men stated that the vortex was the movement of all nature. Leedskalnin claimed that all matter was made of north and south pole magnets, and spiraled against each other to move in counter-opposing screw like patterns between the earths poles

Schauberger noted that water specifically "lives and breathes" through vortex movement. I have noted his observations, and found that as water moves within the stream, the stream also oscillates back and forth. This in truth, powers the vortex (like a booster signal). AS the water travels around the bend in the river, it flows fastest on the inside of the turn, and the most "destructive" power of the turn is on the inside bank -not the outside bank. The outside bank is just the "spill over" area, and where all material is deposited. As such, it tends to be shallower, a lower slope gradient, and as such, appear as if all the work is taking place on the outside bank. But that is for a different topic.

Russell basically defined all matter as the point where Thought folds in on itself to return to Mind. It is like the wrinkles in a rug on a hardwood floor. As someone changes direction, the carpet slips, and the rug bunches up in the direction that the person was walking. This is an effect - or result of the person changing direction. Matter is the accumulation of Thought changing direction to return to its Source.

The above is my summary and paraphrase, but encapsulates the gist.

A friend of mine at this website who is a huge fan and student of Walter Russell defined it like this:

Basically the same concept, just very succinctly put.



Soooooooo....this brings me to my point

I see the 3-6-9 as the framework around which all matter is created or destroyed. The creation is that which leads from Mind, the destructive is that which returns to Mind. The 9 obviously represents Mind/God/The Source. The 3 seems to be that of the "spiritual side, while the 6 seems to be that of the physical side. I am sure one is the outflow, and the other the return. My taught is the 3 is the outflow - creative - and the 6 is the destructive - return. We see this even in the very numbers themselves. The 3 is historically symbolic of Divine Perfection, while the 6 is double that - a mirrored replication if you will. Even the "number of the beast" is "mans number" - 666 (Revelations 13:18). And there are countless thousands of other examples to illustrate this. 

The 1-8, 2-7, 4-5 seem to be the lattice work on which all things are mapped. This further emphasizes the concept of each number being unique (prime). For example, an 8 is a singularity - a point in time/space - that represents where Thought "was" and has left its imprint on the fabric of the universe. While I do agree the 1-8 seems to be a unique hinge point about which all other numbers pivot, I believe these are more like anchor points on a new layer of the torus skin. These are our plot points for lack of better terminology. The other numbers are basically our "rise" and "run" to the next anchor point. Although not invisible, the other numbers are guide marks pointing to our anchor points.

Since 3 & 6 are the only "straight" lines according to Rodin, they HAvE to be the pivot points about which all other numbers rotate. The 3 & 6 for lack of better terms, represent the rotational momentum. Russell defines inward acceleration as that which is returning to Mind, and thus accelerating. Since there must be a balanced opposite, the decelerating force expanding away is its polar opposite. These are the "rails" upon which all matter must ride - which are the 3 & 6.

The below illustration makes it clear. 



In the middle drawing, it is clear that the left hand "-" orb is trying to accelerate inward toward the fulcrum, while the lower right-hand "+" orb is trying to flow outward away from the fulcrum. Since they are connected together, if perfectly balanced with perfect thrust and harmonic distance (spin) they will form a perfect oscillation about the fulcrum and begin to wobble in a three dimensional spiral. Instant Vortex.


If we were to give this motion direction, instead of allowing it to wander randomly on its own, we would have a vector - and motion would be observed as it is in Figure 61 below.



As a side tangent, in figure 59, the "black" space is not just the absence of the "light" space - it is the polar opposite expanding in an outward spiral from the center. Excellent explanations of this concept in the following images that should be read 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Anyway, in my mind, it becomes clear that the 3 *probably* represents the guiding force that expands away from the center of all creation (God) and the 6 represents that return path. These paths hold the vortex's in their respective linear vectors and we witness the effects as the "known universe". The 1-8 pairs are the anchor points of the next beginning curve, and they must follow the thrust given them by the 3 & 6. These create the angular momentum that we witness in the other numbers. Russell stated "All direction is curved - all motion is spiral". I think this becomes self-evident when understanding the role that these numbers play. Since we are seeking a "higher" level of energy/understanding/whatever - I think we constantly find the 6 as the guiding force back to the Center. In short, even if we aren't looking for it, it is the most tangible element of the vortex when we look for a "cause". It is the Holy Grail of the ZPE and Over unity folks. As such, we find the "anomalies" of systems in the 6. Since it is from our perspective - the furthest point removed from the Creator - we are seeing all things in return. And since our Rodin Map tells us that 3-6-9 appear as a triune group that doubles on itself (3-9-6-6-9-3) there must be an explanation. Conveniently since two 3's is 6, and two 6's is 3, we never abandon our concept. The two continually interchange between each other. Because as there is no inflow without an outflow, it further emphasizes that Leedskalnin's concept is more universal in nature then first glance. We see the 6 in all areas, but how many of them are actually doubled 3's? 

We can find the outflow (the 3) but we have to acknowledge that there is a Source and point from which all things originate first. Since this flies in opposition of mainstream science, it is not acknowledged. We try to latch on to those two streams with "hot" and "cold" electricity, and we can occasionally catch glimpses of it when we build devices that operate in "unity". Instead, we focus on the most basic of this entire system, and "cut lines of flux", burn or explode, and do the very lowest form of "work" with this balance. We are basically playing at the very apex of wave as it returns to the point. If we would concentrate on working with this breathing flow, we could create machines and devices of unimaginable capabilities. In short, science is looking at the 4-7 and thinking that have obtained the holy grail. They occasionally stumble on the 1 & 8 and think there is an anomaly, or something that can be explained away. They spend their time building equipment, devices and mathematical formulae to observe the 2 through 7, and believe the 1 & 8 are inconvenient anomalies that we will better understand at a later date. If they would acknowledge a 9, and focus on the 3 & 6, it would really make the entire thing come into clear focus, and we could progress as a species. However, that would end the clever entrapments that have been established over the centuries, and people would find themselves free....I guess that just wont happen.

The irrational Phi spiral might provide a type of damping that allows noise to organize into whole number harmonics within the fibonacci intervals that form when manifestation is attracted back to its source, the nodes that form are like the joints of free space that act like a resonance chamber, or egg for organized manifestation.

888 = 6

111 = 3

Each mirror set of 12 fibonacci numbers, oscillates between the 888:111; the 3:6. This could be like the dipole of the 9. Or relative to how the VBM circuit animation oscillates 9,3,9,6,9,3,9,6,9,3,9,6,9,3,9.

The in breath and the outbreath of cosmic manifestation of all scales, linked in proportional correspondence along Phi proportions like sacred geometry.


The 9 as Maximum gravity shows in the diagrams do surround all permutations of itself in a mathematical organization, allowing for all sorts of patterns and variety to form within a controlled boundary.


Some ideas that I think are relative to the first 65 posts of this thread.