|
|
General: "CUBO MAGICO" ESTA DISEÑADO EN FUNCION AL "AGUJERO DE GUSANO"
Elegir otro panel de mensajes |
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mihryazd  Hi everyone,
I see a lot of activity going on. I am joining the gang in order to point out to the significance of 37.
|
Welcome to the thread, MihrYazd... Here's a wee bit more research compiled on 37 and the Lo Shu Values:
The number 37,as shown below (and in greater detail in post#16),has a pervasive, yet often 'hidden', influence in the set of 81 tones:Linear Arrangement of the 81 Lo Shu Tonesshown here in their 3-digit frequency form{Reduced by their only common denominator, which is 3**  Note that in the above diagram, now 37 becomes the 'primary' numberas well as the main vertical (in this diagonal diagram) incremental number...____________________1/81 = .012345679...these digits sum to, you guessed it, 37...______________________Subset of 27 tones
{anchored by the 37 points of the Hemicube**
 More on 27 and 37
The numbers 27 and 37 are 'reciprocals' of each other:
1/27 = .037037037...
1/37 = .027027027...
and
27 x 37 = 999
{999 is the largest frequency in the 81 toneset**
_______________
The 27 (2-digit) tones shown on the Hemicube
in the previous post add up to the value of 1485:
1485/37 = 40.135135...
1485/27 = 55
The central hub around which the entire
81 Lo Shu toneset revolves is 55:
55/40.135135 = 1.370370...
and
40.135135/55 = .729729...
also
37/27 = 1.370370...
and
27/37 = .729729...
_________
729 is the number of hexagrams in the Tai Hsuan Ching:
9 x 9 x 9 = 729
__________________
This value of 1.370370... is also quite significant:
According to the United States Bureau of Standards
the physical constant (or fine structure constant)
of the hydrogen atom is 37/27 x 100:
As we saw above 37/27 = 1.370370...
So 1.370370 x 100 = 137.037037...
_______________
{The following is exerpted from chapter 4 of Wilcock's Divine Cosmos**
THE FINE-STRUCTURE CONSTANT
This constant has been continuously studied by spectroscope analysis,
and the highly revered physicist Richard P. Feynman explained the
mystery in his book The Strange Theory of Light and Matter.
(This value) has been a mystery ever since it was discovered more
than fifty years ago, and all good theoretical physicists put this
number up on their wall and worry about it.
Immediately you would like to know
where this number for a coupling comes from:
is it related to pi or perhaps to the base of natural logarithms?
Nobody knows, it is one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics:
a magic number that comes to us with no understanding by man.
You might say that the "hand of God" wrote that number,
and "we don't know how He pushed His pencil."
,
Last edited by mythmath; 01-08-2010 at 11:49 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Movement from one magic square to the next is beautifully simple. MOVEMENT=doubling circuit. MAGIC SQUARE=matrix movement+magic square= doubling circuit matrixrefer to this post for details  edit: I need to revise my conclusion on multiple digit doubling circuits. While I noted that each digit is doubled individually, this is not universal, and applies to a different setting. (refer to Kubera-Kolam ) Values are doubled normally, as octaves, and digital reduction is a parallel process. I will update with more detail.
Last edited by mane; 02-08-2010 at 06:58 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
I was playing around with reciprocals and number 432 as a starting point, inspired by Jamie's frequencies. 1 / 2 = 5 1 / 4 = 25 1 / 8 = 125 1 / 16 = 625 1 / 32 = 3125 1 / 64 = 15625 1 / 2 7 = 37 (32+5) 1 / 5 4 = 18 5 (16+2) 1 / 1 08 = 9 25 (8+1) 1 / 2 16 = 4 625 1 / 4 32 = 2 3125 1 / 8 64 = 1 15625 1 / 37 = 27 1 / 74 = 135 1 / 148 = 675 1 / 296 = 3375 .. both halves combined (27 + 37) 64 64 128 320 256 1600 ... Another example of 9 / 11 1 / 9 = 11 1 / 18 = 55 1 / 36 = 275 1 / 72 = 1375 etc... Doubling and halving at different levels.. perhaps again one step closer to understanding numbers  Thought I'd share my insight..
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=61370&page=62
|
|
|
|
|
@ sadukan: whose opinion? mine? I am glad its not just my opinion and academics that get published have such opinions. sadukan have you been published as of yet? opinions are dime a dozen. get published sadukan then at least your opinion can carry some weight. why the smoke screen? you sense i am using one? wikipedia: A smoke screen is smoke released to mask the movement or location of military units such as infantry, tanks, aircraft or ships. ...dude, are we @ war and i didn't know? i offered you a gift based upon the Holy 19. I offered another connection with the ascension process of the Prophet Muhammed, the Miraj. Did you count the steps to paradise in that beautiful work of art that the Persians left for us? Whats the connection with 19? Can we enter paradise together? to your ego and not your jivatman sadukan here is my analysis of your latest symbolic art work: I think your diagram without any explanation is a smoke screen. Putting your gurus in bold in the second line and even mentioning Ralph, lol. But of course he should be mentioned with all the pitty little guys that u seek their attention and approval, not the likes of your primary gurus typed in bold: MARKO RODIN, LEE BURTON and LALEH BAKHTIAR .All in BOLD, for everyone to see your ego, and putting the rune symbols @ the cornerS, envokating the runes and then blending it with your avatar @ other corners. What type of ego is that sadukan? Dude if you got something to add that can simplify things and brings a coherent chunk of knowledge for everyone to share do so, we all appreciate it. Like how Lee is open with his findings and very willing to further elaborate his model with tons and tons of 3D rendering. Or riseball whom stayed up all night few nights in a row to crunch-up the Meru Codes, or jtstatic helping mi find those 3 SSS with the asymmetry the lurked within Lee's symmetrical matrix, or Barbitone who is researching and archiving. I my self am doing research 24/7. Seeking truth through the Numbers. I have identified 37 and i have linked it to 27. 37 x 3 = 111 = Solfeggio 37 x 27 = 999 37 = The harvest that needs no sowing 37 has let me to Tibetan Cosmology. 37 has let me to 64. Sadukan whats the relation of 17, 27, and 37? 17 x 9 = 153 27 x 9 = 243 37 x 9 = 333 333 - 153 = 180 333 - 243 = 90 leaps of 90 17 + 27 + 37 = 81 81 x 9 = 729 now regarding 153 and Ralph's theory: I wish he was here as i don't want to misquote him, but here he already made a reminder to u sadukan regarding 153:
Quote:
Originally Posted by sadukan View Post
The koran is also coded throughout with "19" and also prime numbers.
How about this: 113+153=266...?
(113 pre-fixed suras, and 153 fish in the Gospel of John) |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raphael:
well that I took notice of.
113 was my former union number as firefighter...then it was changed to 3888.
153 = 17 x 9
DUDEs who love to feud using IGNORANCE, a reminder is in order... |
@ vbmers:please be ware of the significance of 153 and its correct calculations and significance: 17 x 9 = 153 153 = 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13+14+15+16+17, or sum(17). 17 is what is called a "triangular number." If you add the numbers 1 through 17 to each other you get 153. This is what is known as the ancient "pebble count" way of counting. If we take the 153 "pebble count" triangular base with 17 "pebble count" sides and build up to the final cap-stone: The total pebble count is 969 and it builds, not a pyramid, but an equilateral tetrahedron: A four sided object with three equal triangular sides meeting at an apex and a fourth equal side as its triangular base.  This is the equilateral tetrahedron which represents the New Jerusalem Temple: "The 17, 153, 969 Qodesh-Temple of Yeshua."The 17 layers of the Tetrahedron from the One "Capstone" to the "153" base: If we take the 153 "pebble count" triangular base with 17 "pebble count" sides and build up to the final cap-stone: The total pebble count is 969 and it builds, not a pyramid, but an equilateral tetrahedron: A four sided object with three equal triangular sides meeting at an apex and a fourth equal side as its triangular base. This is the equilateral tetrahedron which represents the New Jerusalem Temple: So we have in Methuselah, (living 969 years,) a portrait of the completed New Temple of Yeshua, the base of which was prophesied when Peter caught the 153 fishes. It is perfect in math, and in the perfect Word, and placed there by the Holy Spirit of G-d. No man could have designed such an outcome in any book, written by any man, or group of men, ever in the history of all time. @ sadukan: Now onto your diagram: The tools used by your primary gurus the 4 NAMES that you mentioned tools being: vbm (Marko), Lo shu (Lee) , Ennegram (Laleh), the 4th guru of yours i am not familiar thus i don't know his tool, maybe you can enlighten us as to your system and diagram or your other diagram that your cried over because Ralph posted it what you call your eye of Horus.
Dude were you high on shrooms when you drew that and now you can't make sense of it yourself? Is that why you don't elaborate on your art work?Regarding our friend Jose Arguelles Mayan Factor Calender, oh i am so very very glad you brought up the subject. That will be the subject of my next post and your base20. Namaste, MihrYazd
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=61370&page=63
|
|
|
|
|
Saturn and Luna Squares MythMath Avatar
{As Above, So Below** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Reply |
Message 71 of 71 on the subject |
|
 Love 2 the 9s
Love 2 the 9s
Quote:
God said to Haggai (2:18, 2the9)
“From this day on – from this twenty fourth day of the ninth month, give careful thought:
Is there yet any seed left in the barn? Until this day the vine (bride of Christ) and
the fig tree (Israel – bride of God) the pomgranate and the olive tree have not borne fruit.
From this day on I will bless you.” |
Quote:
In verse 12 God says to Israel:
“Return, faithless Israel, declares the Lord.
I will frown on you no longer, for I am merciful, declares the Lord.
I will not be angry forever.
Only acknowledge your guilt – you have rebelled against the Lord your God,
you have scattered your favors to foreign gods under every spreading tree,
and have not obeyed me.” |
The Dawn of Earth's Great MillenniumMagnificent Evidences that the New Day is Dawning!http://www.sonstoglory.com/millenniumgematria.htm“Come, let us return to the Lord. He has injured us but he will bind up our wounds.
After two days he will revive us; on the third day he will restore us, that we may live in his presence.
Let us acknowledge the Lord; let us press on to acknowledge him.
As surely as the sun rises, (the dawn of the Millennium) he will appear;
he will come to us like the winter rains, like the spring rains that water the earth.”“I was pushed back and about to fall, but the Lord helped me.
The Lord is my strength and my song; he has become my salvation....
The Lord has chastened me severely, but he has not given me over to death.
Open for me the gates of righteousness; I will enter and give thanks to the Lord...
I will give thanks for you answered me; you have become my salvation....
This is the day that the Lord has made; let us rejoice and be glad in it.
O Lord, save us;
O Lord grant us success.
Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.”“The fruit of righteousness will be peace;
the effect of righteousness will be quietness and confidence forever." 21 12 (20+1) 12onOFFonOFF http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucifix_(Michelangelo)  3.6.
9 = 1 + 8
__________________
CRISTIS
Last edited by science2art; 29-07-2012 at 07:00 PM.
| Reply |
Message 51 of 51 on the subject |
|
Monad
__________________
CRISTIS
Last edited by science2art; 12-12-2012 at 08:43 PM.
LOS CUATRO CIRCULOS, ESTAN DISEÑADOS EN EL CONTEXTO AL PATRON DEL MISMO TABLERO DE AJEDREZ, OSEA OCHO CUADRADOS POR OCHO CUADRADOS, QUE NOS DA LA SUMA TOTAL DE 64, EN EL MARCO A QUE EN LAS CUATRO ORIENTACIONES NOS QUEDA LIBRE CUATRO. MULTIPLICANDO DICHO ULTIMO NUMERO POR EL NUMERO CUATRO TENEMOS 16 CUADRADOS QUE NOS QUEDA AFUERA DE LOS CUATRO CIRCULOS Y 48 CUBIERTAS POR LOS MISMOS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cubes must be glued face-to-face, and the boundary of the resulting object should be topologically equivalent to an nn-torus, by which I mean a genus-nn handlebody in R3R3 (as per Kevin Walker's terminological correction). For example, 8 cubes are needed to form a 1-toroid:
And it seems that 13 cubes are needed for a 2-toroid:
I know how intricate is the analogous question for minimizing the number of triangles from which one can build a torus (cf. Császár's Torus), but I am hoping that my much easier question has an answer for arbitrary nn. Thanks for ideas and/or pointers!
Addendum. Here is Steve Huntsman's 20-cube candidate for genus-5:
|
|
|
 Primer
Anterior
39 a 53 de 83
Siguiente
Último
|
|
| |
|
|
©2024 - Gabitos - Todos los derechos reservados | |
|
|
