La última cena de los científicos

Originally Posted by raphael 

http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l2...Tarot52811.jpg

11 2 5 8 = 26 

As I have been suggesting.
Folks reduced the creation to a mathematical expression...expressed as '26'.
Long ago
We continue to ignore the obvious.

JHVH = 26 = 10 + 5 + 6 + 5 = 26 = 11 + 2 + 5 + 8 

god was multiples of 13?
26
52 
78
here is the link to the Freemason text that suggests, we have been down this path before?
http://www.regulargrandlodgevirginia...of_Masonry.pdf

namaste

Originally Posted by jozen bo 

This is the first thing I ever wrote on a forums, I run out of work and sat there on my computer drifting through the internet when I stumbled on this conversation about dimensions. As I read it I noticed I could register and comment, so I figured it would be fun. I was much snappier at this time, and looking back I must laugh a little at how hot tempered I was, not to mention somewhat cocky. It basically has a lot to do with the meaning of numbers. It started on the 2nd page:

Hello,
Dimensions?
Let us begin...It is impossible to seperate or isolate 1 dimension from any other, they are an array of simultaneos relation. For example, a 1 dimensional string still has a left and right side of it, plus a up and a down. Even more perturbing, it has infinite curvature, meaning it inherently contains all the other dimensions and every possible phase of existence therewithin. That said and done, let us quickly go through the unfolding of creation, pretending breifly that they could be isolated and analyzed independently. I won't provide the deeper explainations, but I have devoted my life to understanding and seeing the truth of our being. So away we go...
0=void, Vacumn, non-being, singularity, unfathomable, neither empty nor full.
1=linearality, lines (curve a string and u get a plane of imaginary flatness)
2=flatness, planes (curve a plane and u get imaginary space)
3=space, spatial, xyz (curve a space and u get a static vibration)
4=static vibrations, rythmic, frequancy without magnitude, reoccurung, ether, shadow (curve a static vibration and u get light)
5=static electromagnetic patterns of spectral lines,magnitude, limitation (curve the light and u get location)
6=location relative to itself, paths, positions, a place that differs from another place (curve a position and u get a shell)
7=the middle of the middle, a shell, in between inside and out, between wave and particle (curve a wave shell into itself and u get particle guts)
8=particle filling, charge, force, quality within the geometirc shape of the wave shell, electric nature (curve the filling of a particle (that is, quantom energy---quaron bits) and u get uncertianty!!!)
9=uncertianty, probobality, possibílity, chaos (curving chaos energy into itself unfolds the crystalizations of thought!!!)
10=thought, that is, that every particle in all has its own thoughts and when those thoughts sychronize (be means of the bonds formed of the 8th dimension) our minds can operate. (curve a thought into itself and u get...Gravity callapse)
11=gravity, yes...gravity owes its nature to the thought of matter...before anyone says that electromagnetic waves or also effected by blackholes...remember that dimensions cannot be seperated in truth from each other. (curve gravity into itself and u get the center of the wave shell, the equilibruibrial center of consciousness)
12=consciousness, thought without consciousness is like us thinking and not knowing it. Consciousness is the 12th dimension, unfolding from nothing itself. (curve consciousness into itself and u get...infinity, which is also 0)
13=infinity, the polorized complement, oneness of opposites, zero, nothing (curving the polarity of opposites and u get a line...sound familair). So we are right back where we started. the 13th dimension is also the same as the zeroth dimension. the circle is complete.

But wait...there are also 26 interdimensions that unfold out of the 13 dimensions. I won't go into detail, but the difference between the two includes that which moves (interdimensional reality) and that that doe not move (dimensional reality). Think about a disco ball at a night club...it might help a little. So there u go...Xeno...the 6th dimension is the positional realm that allows u to be somewhere someone else isn't. And u are a good and wise man to ask such a question...I commend u.

As for any who contend my answer or dare to put me down...beware of self ridicule. I have access to the mind portal and a vast understanding of all subject material, especially CHAOS SCIENCE. If u don't understand what I've written...its not my fault that u are so stupid...but everyone has to start somewhere. 


 I added that last bit to try and challenge, I was being somewhat annoying but I figured someone would challenge it and I would have something to build on. I also figured no one would no what I was talking about when I mentioned the Mind Portal, and that they would assume they did. That was such a long while ago....LOLOLOL!!! I was and still am very confident, though at the time I was at work trying to figure out how to pass the time when the assignments ran out at work. 

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=212&page=2

It takes off from there, and as I review it a little I notice how hot tempered I could get, but I do cool off. There is so much all around us conveying the meaning of numbers, you don't have to look very far. But if you want to research them, there are a number of ways to do it...LOL!!! 

The meaning of numbers changes in accordance to how numbers are viewed and with what significant value we comprehend them as having. The meaning of a number can have a higher charge of possibility from one person to the next. There is no base board of numbers behind reality, only fluid geometry that is out of the reach of numbers to fully define. 

It is easy to say say add this number to that number, what does the number mean...how many of this and that there is. I wrote a little on this in a thread I started called: what is the meaning of numbers? It starts:

Example: one apple isn't really one thing, it is a composure of billions of atoms. When we say it is one apple we identify it as something separate from its surroundings. The apple is engaged in changing with its environment. It is truly one only when its entire surroundings are identified as part of it, otherwise it is separate and cannot mean one in quality, only quantity.

Math apparently can be separated into two regions. The first is most familiar to the western world. It is quantitative mathematics. All science uses quantitative mathematics . A basic example: one apple and one apple together are two apples. Cut one apple in half and we have two halves. This kind of mathematics has came a long way, we have integrated a consider amount of knowledge regarding its operation.

The second region is less familiar, what are the qualities of numbers themselves? How do they add up? Do they have a nature? Are they nothing more then things we made up? Numbers have philosphical signifiagance. For example: one reality composed of infinite position. We can't start counting photons quality one's at a time under these terms because they are interacting with other things, they are not truly isolated from the reality they are of- though we can do it by quantity.

The main difference between the two is quantity math never explains what one is in terms of quality and quality math (philosophic math, what numbers themselves really are in existence) never explains one in terms of quantity. The two seem connected by zero, as it represents basically the same thing to both, that is, nothing.

Take the mathematics of the Mayan’s to further illastrate this example. They used both methods of doing math and combined them as well. Zero, one, two, etc...being fundamental quantities where attributed qualities as well. If I'm correct, two is polar and one is unity, whereas zero is void. Numbers continue like this in their system until the meanings contain everything, then they add a digit. T

Their modulation for performing mathematics was 20, ours is 10, our computers use 2. So or so the quantities add up the same, the procedures are not the same. Take binary for example. Could you imagine doing all your mathematics problems using only a binary language? How painful would that be to write out all those ones and zeros? Could your mind perform immediately the same processes for doing math, or wouldn't you need a good amount of readjusting time.

Without possessing our advanced tools of observation they calculated the distant of neighboring stars, solar cycles, on down to what apparently their math revealed as subtle cycles of energy in nature. They lefts star maps and bits of their work behind; which still isn't fully understood today.

So I bring up this quandary. Our own closest version of quantity math (the meaning of numbers and how that adds up) would be in the study of philosophy, which is like a massive ocean of input, combined of so many cultures. How does the world define and recognize the profound significance of numbers, attributing them to the appearance of phenomena in some way to describe them. It would be interesting to compare and analyze the various descriptions.

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=76810

When it comes to the meaning of numbers, despite what I know I am still learning what I can myself. Its a good question and I find myself getting a better idea after so much observing. There is still so much more to learn about numbers!!!


All the Best,
Jozen-Bo