Quote:
Originally Posted by mane  |
mane, I too have found that this happens. It seems that there is occasional "human error" in some of our already established constraining systems though, and this system really does work them out. The nice thing is it makes thing predictable, and able to be checked easily. This tells me that there is an inerrant amount of truth in this system, which makes me further believe it is correct and not just "coincidental"
LONG RAMBLING POST WARNING.....This leads to another point that I have started to post several times, but always delete because I cant adequately explain it. I will try again.
I do understand Rodin when he describes this as the "fingerprint of God". What I am beginning to see is that each number has its own rules that it must adhere to. And these numbers define the "flow" from creator to creation. In short, I think Walter Russell adequately described the concept, and I see these concepts repeated with people like Schauberger and Leedskalnin.
Both of these men stated that the vortex was the movement of all nature. Leedskalnin claimed that all matter was made of north and south pole magnets, and spiraled against each other to move in counter-opposing screw like patterns between the earths poles
Schauberger noted that water specifically "lives and breathes" through vortex movement. I have noted his observations, and found that as water moves within the stream, the stream also oscillates back and forth. This in truth, powers the vortex (like a booster signal). AS the water travels around the bend in the river, it flows fastest on the inside of the turn, and the most "destructive" power of the turn is on the inside bank -not the outside bank. The outside bank is just the "spill over" area, and where all material is deposited. As such, it tends to be shallower, a lower slope gradient, and as such, appear as if all the work is taking place on the outside bank. But that is for a different topic.
Russell basically defined all matter as the point where Thought folds in on itself to return to Mind. It is like the wrinkles in a rug on a hardwood floor. As someone changes direction, the carpet slips, and the rug bunches up in the direction that the person was walking. This is an effect - or result of the person changing direction. Matter is the accumulation of Thought changing direction to return to its Source.
The above is my summary and paraphrase, but encapsulates the gist.
A friend of mine at
this website who is a huge fan and student of Walter Russell defined it like this:
Quote:
"Electricity Defined
Electricity is the strain or tension set up by the two opposing desires of universal Mind thinking: the desire for balanced action and the desire for rest.
This universe is a complexity of strains caused by the interaction of these two opposing, interchanging electric desires.
All matter is electric. All matter is conditioned into greater or lesser strains according to the intensity of desire which is the cause of all electric strain to which it is subjected.
The farther removed from rest, the greater the strain or tension. That which we call high electric potential is merely great strain to maintain a condition which is far from the condition of rest." |
Basically the same concept, just very succinctly put.
Soooooooo....this brings me to my point
I see the 3-6-9 as the framework around which all matter is created or destroyed. The creation is that which leads from Mind, the destructive is that which returns to Mind. The 9 obviously represents Mind/God/The Source. The 3 seems to be that of the "spiritual side, while the 6 seems to be that of the physical side. I am sure one is the outflow, and the other the return. My taught is the 3 is the outflow - creative - and the 6 is the destructive - return. We see this even in the very numbers themselves. The 3 is historically symbolic of Divine Perfection, while the 6 is double that - a mirrored replication if you will. Even the "number of the beast" is "mans number" - 666 (Revelations 13:18). And there are countless thousands of other examples to illustrate this.
The 1-8, 2-7, 4-5 seem to be the lattice work on which all things are mapped. This further emphasizes the concept of each number being unique (prime). For example, an 8 is a singularity - a point in time/space - that represents where Thought "was" and has left its imprint on the fabric of the universe. While I do agree the 1-8 seems to be a unique hinge point about which all other numbers pivot, I believe these are more like anchor points on a new layer of the torus skin. These are our plot points for lack of better terminology. The other numbers are basically our "rise" and "run" to the next anchor point. Although not invisible, the other numbers are guide marks pointing to our anchor points.
Since 3 & 6 are the only "straight" lines according to Rodin, they HAvE to be the pivot points about which all other numbers rotate. The 3 & 6 for lack of better terms, represent the rotational momentum. Russell defines inward acceleration as that which is returning to Mind, and thus accelerating. Since there must be a balanced opposite, the decelerating force expanding away is its polar opposite. These are the "rails" upon which all matter must ride - which are the 3 & 6.
The below illustration makes it clear.
In the middle drawing, it is clear that the left hand "-" orb is trying to accelerate inward toward the fulcrum, while the lower right-hand "+" orb is trying to flow outward away from the fulcrum. Since they are connected together, if perfectly balanced with perfect thrust and harmonic distance (spin) they will form a perfect oscillation about the fulcrum and begin to wobble in a three dimensional spiral. Instant Vortex.
If we were to give this motion direction, instead of allowing it to wander randomly on its own, we would have a vector - and motion would be observed as it is in Figure 61 below.
As a side tangent, in figure 59, the "black" space is not just the absence of the "light" space - it is the polar opposite expanding in an outward spiral from the center. Excellent explanations of this concept in the following images that should be read
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Anyway, in my mind, it becomes clear that the 3 *probably* represents the guiding force that expands away from the center of all creation (God) and the 6 represents that return path. These paths hold the vortex's in their respective linear vectors and we witness the effects as the "known universe". The 1-8 pairs are the anchor points of the next beginning curve, and they must follow the thrust given them by the 3 & 6. These create the angular momentum that we witness in the other numbers. Russell stated "All direction is curved - all motion is spiral". I think this becomes self-evident when understanding the role that these numbers play. Since we are seeking a "higher" level of energy/understanding/whatever - I think we constantly find the 6 as the guiding force back to the Center. In short, even if we aren't looking for it, it is the most tangible element of the vortex when we look for a "cause". It is the Holy Grail of the ZPE and Over unity folks. As such, we find the "anomalies" of systems in the 6. Since it is from our perspective - the furthest point removed from the Creator - we are seeing all things in return. And since our Rodin Map tells us that 3-6-9 appear as a triune group that doubles on itself (3-9-6-6-9-3) there must be an explanation. Conveniently since two 3's is 6, and two 6's is 3, we never abandon our concept. The two continually interchange between each other. Because as there is no inflow without an outflow, it further emphasizes that Leedskalnin's concept is more universal in nature then first glance. We see the 6 in all areas, but how many of them are actually doubled 3's?
We can find the outflow (the 3) but we have to acknowledge that there is a Source and point from which all things originate first. Since this flies in opposition of mainstream science, it is not acknowledged. We try to latch on to those two streams with "hot" and "cold" electricity, and we can occasionally catch glimpses of it when we build devices that operate in "unity". Instead, we focus on the most basic of this entire system, and "cut lines of flux", burn or explode, and do the very lowest form of "work" with this balance. We are basically playing at the very apex of wave as it returns to the point. If we would concentrate on working with this breathing flow, we could create machines and devices of unimaginable capabilities. In short, science is looking at the 4-7 and thinking that have obtained the holy grail. They occasionally stumble on the 1 & 8 and think there is an anomaly, or something that can be explained away. They spend their time building equipment, devices and mathematical formulae to observe the 2 through 7, and believe the 1 & 8 are inconvenient anomalies that we will better understand at a later date. If they would acknowledge a 9, and focus on the 3 & 6, it would really make the entire thing come into clear focus, and we could progress as a species. However, that would end the clever entrapments that have been established over the centuries, and people would find themselves free....I guess that just wont happen.
Quote:
“Great art is simple. My universe is great art, for it is simple.
“Great art is balanced. My universe is consummate art, for it is balanced simplicity.
“My universe is one in which many things have majestic measure: and again another many have measure too fine for sensing.
“Yet I have not one law for majestic things, and another law which are beyond the sensing.
“I have but one law for all my opposed pairs of creating things: and that law needs but one word to spell it out, so hear me when I say that one word of My one law is
BALANCE
“And if man needs two words to aid him in his knowing of the workings of that law, let those two words be
BALANCED INTERCHANGE
“If man still needs more words to aid his knowing of My one law, give to him another one, and let those three words be
RHYTHMIC BALANCED INTERCHANGE”
--From THE DIVINE ILLIAD |
Argomento precedente
).
).
(phi) o 
(theta). Este arco es el desplazamiento efectuado en el movimiento circular y se obtiene mediante la posición angular (
ó 
) en la que se encuentra en un momento determinado el móvil y al que se le asocia un ángulo determinado en radianes. Así el arco angular o desplazamiento angular se determinará por la variación de la posición angular entre dos momentos final e inicial concretos (dos posiciones distintas):
ó 
el arco angular o desplazamiento angular dado en radianes.
al espacio recorrido a lo largo de la trayectoria curvilínea de la circunferencia de radio 
se tiene que es el producto del radio de la trayectoria circular por la variación de la posición angular (desplazamiento angular):
al espacio recorrido (del inglés "space"). Nótese que al multiplicar el radio por el ángulo en radianes, al ser estos últimos adimensionales (arco entre radio), el resultado es el espacio recorrido en unidades de longitud elegidas para expresar el radio.
(omega minúscula) y viene definida como:
es el módulo la velocidad tangencial a lo largo de la trayectoria circular de radio R, se tiene que:
y se la calcula:
) se puede calcular la fuerza centrípeta a la que está sometido el móvil mediante la siguiente relación:
entonces el ángulo 
formado por la fuerza y la aceleración es:
y por tanto 
y para el movimiento circular uniforme se tiene 
y por tanto también 
. Para velocidades muy pequeñas y ángulos expresados en 
.gif/120px-Inside-out_torus_(animated%2C_small).gif)
In mathematics the symbol of the infinity is represented by a 8 laid down. 
