Hey fr0sty,
Regarding the Ark of the Covenant comments, there are many illogical explanations regarding the "sarcophagus" in the Kings Chamber, among other things. I have my own explanations, but will reserve them for now. I do find it interesting that the Ark would fit in there. It really makes perfect sense to me. I find one of the most amazing things about the Pyramids is until this last century, man could not fathom a building being that tall. There was no such way to build a building that big. Ironically, the tallest - the World Trade Center Towers, didn't even make it 100 years. I live in a house that is about 110 years old, and it is constantly in need of maintenance, and "major" structural repairs. Yet the pyramids have remained in perfect alignment and structural integrity for well over 4000 years. I think it really shows how insignificant our modern thought really is.
Interesting info regarding Pi. I had seen a documentary on TV about 15 years ago that discussed this in some detail regarding the Pyramid. The final conclusion pretty much supports your conclusions. They estimated that the same mathematics would be reached by taking a wheel, and walking the side of the pyramid, then basically, doubling that for the height. Apparently, the anomaly works itself into that equation, to make it differ from the mathematical ideal.
For the rest of what you post - I really have no idea what you are trying to say. The only words I understood was North Star.
I have also read a few different books regarding "Pyramid Mathematics". It makes me believe that we are missing something with our conventional math. In reading your post, I am even more convinced of it. LOL
I have also found that geometric structures do not translate in real life to what our mathematical models suggest. Your diamond structure is a prime example. I found this out building a pyramid out of smaller pyramids and tetrahedrons. I basically stumbled across Pascal's Pyramid (at least as represented
by this page). The only difference, is the way it is drawn on that website is a bit confusing, is more of a cross-section of the octahedron, instead of a general octahedron shape that you would build. This looks like someone took a core sample. However, the important thing is it requires a combination of tetrahedron and pyramids to build, tetrahedrons alone are only an optical illusion when the pyramid is rotated. I discovered this with many shapes we represent geometrically. They are not true geometric shapes - just optical illusions of viewing from a rotated angle. I will build a model and post as an explanation if anyone is interested. I have one now, but all pyramids and tetrahedron are white, so it is difficult to understand visually where the tetrahedrons begin and end.